False Economies?

A fool is someone who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.”

Oscar Wilde

This tale starts with my ankles – or more correctly, a recent attack of tendon pain. Serious enough to make me jack in jogging for a week or three, hoping that a bit of rest would allow it to heal. Guess what; it didn’t. I was approaching the point where I was about to start to try to get a doctor’s appointment for their professional view when my trusty hiking trainers – my usual footwear – decided it was all too much and fell apart on me.

Once I’d finished making the purchase decisions (and more importantly, punch my poverty mentality into the corner to get it to ‘allow’ the expenditure) I discovered almost immediately that the new footwear eased my ankles. And a few days later, I’ll cautiously say I think I’m on the mend.

The conclusion here is simple enough; it was my old trainers which was either the culprit or the aggravator. When looked at logically, this news isn’t surprising when my fag-packet told me I’ve clocked up perhaps sixteen-hundred miles in them, while footwear experts say you should look to replace after five hundred. Now, I did try to buy quality but there’s no way I could afford that level of it.

Conclusion; that in the desire to ‘save money’, I ended up injuring myself (hopefully, not permanently). That is, in my book a false economy – that not only did I cause myself pain, but also hindered my ability to do other stuff (like for example, jogging).

Big Picture

While most folks are aware of the term ‘false economy’ (when scrimping on up-front costs increases the spend in the long run, à la the ‘Vimes Boots Theory‘), I prefer to widen it’s definition somewhat; to represent the wastage of other finite resources (such as time, personal energy etc) or when the ‘cheap’ option costs more in intangibles (such as physical pain, in my shoes example). So, without further padding, is my list of personal ‘false economies’ – remembering that every rule has at least two exceptions…

#1: Footwear. The classic example. Most know the foolishness of buying cheap shoes which fail in their basic purpose and/or fall apart; but I’m sure the more common failure is in wearing footwear beyond it’s natural life – just because they’re still physically together doesn’t mean they’re still wearable. As I learned above.

#2: Underwear. One of those areas where women have the edge; most know the value of a good bra and the desires to avoid VPL leads to at least a cursory inspection of pants. Overuse is once again the most common ‘economy’ here; the wearing of them after they’ve stopped providing effective support (it’s said you should replace between six and twelve months… but doesn’t mention how many times you wear them before chucking).

Socks can often hit the ‘clean but still stinky’ point before physical decrepitude, which honestly isn’t doing you, or your shoes any favours. Yes, there are often ways to (hopefully) deal with this problem, but unless you’ve got a large load to treat I would class it as a waste of your time doing it and simply bin them.

#3: Clothing. Yeah, I’m not going to give you the ‘green’ bitch about it. Or the ‘fast fashion’ one. Or even the ‘wasting cash’ one. I’m just going to point out the simple fact that you’re paying for storage space of your collection, you shall spend time and effort maintaining the collection and lastly, you’ll spend time going through the collection trying to find something suitable, often at a time you don’t have that time to spare.

I think it was about five years ago I learned about the ‘capsule wardrobe‘ concept, and while the argument for it is strong, I’m not a huge fan. Too confining, too muted, too rigid. Hey, I’m not that hot on doing the laundry, okay? Nor do I live in a land where the weather’s that predictable. Instead, I’m much more the ‘simplified wardrobe’ sort; focusing on general compatibility, flexibility and practicality. Often I buy two, three or even more copes of the same item (once I realise it works); offering a happy medium between ‘not knowing what to wear’ and ‘not having anything to wear because your only pair of black jeans are dirty’. Oh, also wise to try to aim to have as many pieces able to be washed together too – specialist items are a pain.

#4: Mattresses. If playing The Sims only has one ‘life lesson’ in it, ‘buy the best bed you can afford’ is it (no, ‘have a bin in every room of your house’ is the other). For like the game, the better your bed (primarily your mattress, though the bed itself helps) the better your sleep shall be, which shall equal more energy, less grouchiness and improved health. After all, you’re gonna be spending almost a third of your time on the damn thing, it’s logical to put this right at the top of your purchases list.

My theory is; people don’t really realise how much time they spend in bed; something understandable, as we don’t recall most of it. And if you think I’m wrong on this one; tell me, why don’t we sleep on uncomfortable school chairs, park benches or bean-bags?

#5: Fresh Fruit & Vegetables. A controversial choice, I know, but I feel I’ve got a decent case to argue here. My argument is simple enough; that so much cheaper fresh produce is relatively tasteless, some to the point where you wonder why the hell you even bothered to buy it (like I did earlier this year). If you have produce which gives you poor experiences, the chances are you’ll be less inclined to eat it, ultimately increasing wastage (and so per-unit cost). And if you’re trying to get your five-a-day, it’s easier to do it if the items actually taste nice.

However, there are other options (though naturally, not all shall be open to you). A fresh produce box service to your door, greengrocers at markets, more high-end grocery stores. One option often overlooked is the ‘ethnic’ stores; they often stock fresh produce which sometimes can be much better. Sure, it’s more expensive… but it’s not like with like, here.

One last item I’ll mention here for consideration is the bulk purchase of close-dated items. Yes, I know I talked about doing home-frozen fruit and vegetables before, but when it comes down to it the often surprisingly long time of prep-work to sort/clean/chop/bag the stuff makes it a false economy – ending up spending an hour of my life doing something to ultimately save a couple of quid. These days, I normally only bother doing it if I can’t find the products already frozen.

#6: Bulk Buying. The first seemingly counter-intuitive example; ‘but bulk buying saves money in the long run!’. Well… perhaps. Many of the bulk-buying minuses are the same as the previous one; the costs of you storing, curating and searching through your ‘bargains’ to get what you actually need. Yet in this case there’s also the risk of ‘spoilage’; most things shall become unusable (one way or another) eventually – for example, damaged or deteriorate in storage.

Even if we assume you don’t buy a ‘dud’ (like say, a flavour you turn out to dislike) there’s also the issue that a portion of your cash is now locked in as ‘inventory’. Depending just how much buying you do, this could end up as a surprisingly large amount of funds (and space). Truth is; the money is only shown to be ‘saved’ by the time all the purchases have been consumed.

#7: Selling Items. I might write more on this at a later date, but for now, be satisfied with this maxim; if you are thinking of selling something second-hand, forget it – chances are, it’s effectively worthless. Of course, there’s exceptions (there is to all of these) – but not many. My rule of thumb; unless it’s an item which an average pawnbroker’s would be interested in or has a known market (such as near-mint genuine collectables, large electrical items or cars) it’s ultimate value is effectively zero.

The main culprit here is the costs of actually selling the damn thing. Be it in person or online, I’ve seen folks try and fail to sell stuff – ‘decent enough’ stuff too – for a price which would actually give them a return even half the minimum wage. I’ve even seen folks fail to give stuff away. And they wasted a hour or two of their lives trying to shift the fucking thing too. That’s hours you ain’t gonna get back.

#8: DIY. Okay, I’m no Hank Hill, but I’m competent enough to deal with flat-packs, making general repairs, decorating and so on. Generally speaking, most folks who have been poor end up being a bit ‘handy’ – there’s no other choice, it’s either you do it or nothing happens. Yet I would only paint a room or fit a carpet if I was genuinely unable to afford a tradesperson to do it.

My reasoning is twofold. Firstly, the tradesperson would do a better job – almost no doubt about that. The other is that chances are, they’d do it quicker than I would too; in fact, DIY projects can become serious time-sinks for the unwary or unlucky. It’s all about opportunity costs; it’s quite possible that you’d be better off in the whole by using those painting-hours to work elsewhere, to earn the cash to pay for the painter to do it right.

#9: Repairing/Maintaining Items. Similar gig as the previous point; completing the repairs shall often end up being quite a serious time-sink and may become even less economically viable if you need to buy a few specialist items to complete (even if said items are fairly cheap). That’s not even taking into account the issues of learning how to do it…

In my experience, there’s a kind of ‘gap’ in these tasks – items that aren’t ‘worth’ enough to warrant taking it to a ‘professional’ to sort out, but worth too much to simply dispose of (own personal example; coat with split pockets). Result; they end up being undone indefinitely, or you spend many a hour trying to sort it yourself. Examples of these can include clothing alterations, leather item refurbishment, garden tool maintenance, lawn-mower servicing, basic furniture repair and re-potting houseplants.

And the solution is also simple enough; find (and pay) someone else to do it. In times like these, most could do with a bit more cash in the pocket, and there’s quite a lot of folks out there who are relatively ‘time rich’; for example retirees. Ask around your personal network, there’s even freelancers sites out there (though they’ll be more expensive, but more professional). And if the repairs mean you can avoid more spend on replacement items, all the better.

#10: Cheap/Free Delivery. We’ve all been there; awaiting the drop-off of our precious purchases, watching the tracker on the screen… then for it to vanish, for the driver’s running late and has conveniently ‘had issues with the device’. Or you’re stuck at home, mentally bitching because they’ve missed their delivery slot and you’ve got shit to do, y’know. Even better, the delivery turning up when it wasn’t supposed to, being left in the rain and in full view of the street…

The seriousness of the situation, naturally depends on the circumstances; but if you’re getting a decent amount of parcels and/or grief (couriers seem to find it difficult to find my address, for a personal example) it is perhaps worth looking into alternatives – such as renting a parcel drop-off location at a mailbox company. Like above, it’s not exactly cheap, but if you’re relatively time-poor it’s something worth looking into (or simply your time is more productively spent elsewhere). Also going ‘upmarket’ for the better delivery option might be possible, though that’s often something which is in the hands of the sender, not you.

* * *

Okay; some or perhaps most of these may not apply to you, and there’s always going to be exceptions to the rule. But the above are – in my opinion – at least worth considering. And not the same old ‘false economies’ listicles which most folks have worked out eons ago.

As everything on this blog, merely my own thoughts and opinions. Part of my Frugality and Essays series.

‘Eating While Poor’: 2022 Challenge (Part 2)

The second half of my own personal ‘Eating While Poor’ challenge; where I try to see just how far a diet can be realistically squashed finance-wise before it stops fulfilling it’s nutritional needs. Why do it for another week? Simply put; I’ve not had enough attempts at different cheap meals to finally come to a conclusion regarding what could be viewed as a bare minimum for one person.

The rules of this challenge, plus the first week’s experiences can be viewed here; with no further ado I’ll continue the challenge…

Eighth Day

Half day. I’ve run out of my fibre bars, so it’s an apple instead. Another serving of cocoa porridge for breakfast, hoping it’ll prove to have enough staying power in the stomach while out to avoid consuming any expensive barred products. Also made a thermos of tea to take with me, along with my last pear.

Plan works, though it was somewhat a close call by the time I’d got home. Perhaps better to have a banana too next time. Another cream cheese sandwich as a late lunch; noting that I’m getting close to finishing the wholemeal loaf I’d bought a week ago and frozen. Daily foraging turns up some reduced salami and potatoes; dinner is an attempt at a ‘one-pot’ meal; beef mince, baked beans and onion affair, cooked on one ring – I’d bought said mince cheap and frozen a while earlier. Result; rather nice, in fact; but much of this was down to the use of condiments. Supper was the salami as a sandwich.

Conclusions: Got between four and six, depending on your classification of tomato ketchup and baked beans as counting. Salami (or any form of preserved meat) is not a viable solution for meals – the salt and saturates are too high. At least not more than very occasionally. At 65p, the ‘main meal’ was not much more expensive than the porridge (though that was down to the bargain meat I used and cannot be relied on). In both costs and nutrition, there’s quite a good future for baked beans – even if you (like me) go with the ‘lower salt’ option.

Energy2085 cal
Fat47g
…which is saturates18g
Carbohydrate271g
…which is sugars159g
Fibre42g
Protein135g
Salt6.3g
Items Consumed£3.08
Items Bought£0.61
Items Disposed£0.00

Ninth Day

Day off. Fibre cereal for breakfast, have some grilled mushrooms with egg and beans for lunch, mainly to use up the former. A nice change from the never-ending sandwich. Snacks; a bag of ‘nuts and seeds’ I’d got as an end-of line way back and a softbake which came from I’m not sure where. Picked up some cheese and some Heck Meat-Free Chipolatas going cheap, along with some bread rolls. Guess what I had for dinner; melted cheese rolls, with cucumber. It was tasty, though I knew this cost was going to be high…

Conclusions: Hard cheese is not a viable major component of diet – far too much saturated fat. Normally, I’d microwave the cheese and drain off the excess fat, but this time it didn’t work on the variety chosen (Wensleydale). Mushrooms are decent enough, though lacking in the calories make up for it for their fibre, protein and relative low cost. Two/three portions of fruit and veg, depending on your consideration of baked beans.

Energy2061 cal
Fat80g
…which is saturates36g
Carbohydrate199g
…which is sugars77g
Fibre41g
Protein102g
Salt4.4g
Items Consumed£2.76
Items Bought£1.25
Items Disposed£0.00

Tenth Day

Breakfast was several of last night’s chipolatas in the other two rolls with some sauce and onion; spent the morning homeworking, snacking on frankly too many lentil cakes which I’d given up reviewing due to the fact there was nothing to review. Lunch was a few of said cakes, with some cream cheese. Afternoon was work; got through an apple, a couple of clementines and a cup of tea. Lucked out on the evening forage; a load of protein bars and shakes and some bakery croissants. Plus, got given a few pears too. Picked up some jam for said croissants; slightly shocked that the branded ones had now breached the £2 barrier. Also, another cucumber.

Dinner was one of those which shouldn’t have been; milk, jam and croissants. I paid for that by the simple fact it didn’t even really fill; ended up having one of the bars I’d purchased – a ‘LighterLife Bar’ – later on that evening.

Time to do another inventory/clearout of the fridge; disposed of a small grab-bag of old fruits and vegetables, a couple of old over-frozen bread, a jar of marmalade which came from the wrong year and a protein shake which had all generally speaking, been forgotten about.

Conclusions: Unsurprisingly, a load of croissants were not a wise choice; they were over 650 calories, over half my salt allowance and all my saturated even before anything was put with or on them. However, proof (if any was needed) why diets can fuck up; my constant hankering for ‘something a bit tasty‘ led me to paying 25p to scratch that itch. It’s the pies back on the Second Day all over again. Only two portions of fruit/veg today.

Energy2582 cal
Fat74g
…which is saturates36g
Carbohydrate379g
…which is sugars133g
Fibre34g
Protein96g
Salt9.3g
Items Consumed£2.90
Items Bought£8.40
Items Disposed£2.75

Eleventh Day

Day off. Cocoa protein porridge for breakfast, clementines and a pear for snacking. Finished off the remaining Cauldron sausages for lunch, decided to combine this with cooking up a decent piece of chicken breast from the freezer for dinner.

Spent a bit of time online; read that baked beans do count as your ‘five-a-day’, but tomato ketchup didn’t. Also read a couple of articles on ‘how to save money off your food bill’ which told me nothing new. Went out to the discounter’s for peanuts and bananas, found at a supermarket on the way home a load of date bars and some milk going cheap. The former went into the cupboard for packed lunches, the latter mainly got frozen into cubes for later tea and coffee consumption; had to throw a little of it away, mind.

As another meal test, I had the earlier chicken, with some couscous and steamed green beans I’d found in the freezer earlier – the former done with just a kettle and the latter in the microwave (along with the chicken). It tasted good; though I do need a bit more practice cooking this method so I get the times lined up.

Conclusions: Peanuts or chicken; not both. Or perhaps the date-ball I ‘tried’. The higher ‘consumption cost’ today was down to the said chicken. The green beans were good and cheap, mind – I knew this before, but not how cheap until I worked it out now.

Energy2368 cal
Fat83g
…which is saturates14g
Carbohydrate242g
…which is sugars158g
Fibre41g
Protein161g
Salt5.4g
Items Consumed£3.34
Items Bought£2.83
Items Disposed£0.05

Twelfth Day

Now, I had a nice description of this day and the next done, but the crappy word processor I’m using decided to both crash and fuck up the recovery save, so you’ll have to simply put up with the bare-bones account I’ve reconstructed from my notes.

This day’s lunch comprised me trying out doing a jacket potato in the microwave; it wasn’t completely successful, but enough that it suggests it’s a viable method of cooking for this. I also didn’t appreciate that it was in fact possible to jazz it up somewhat using just a few condiments.

Shopping for this day was some cheap carrots, grapes and kiwi fruits; the latter two hopefully to counteract my constant hankering for sugar. Dinner was egg and baked beans on toast. This proved to be somewhat better nutritionally than I – and I suspect others – would believe.

Conclusions: Once again, baked beans come through with their good fibre rating and decent protein at an affordable cost. The low consumption cost for today is explainable due to two things; the lack of meat and the relative lack of fruit (two portions). Peanuts also helped here.

Energy2072 cal
Fat78g
…which is saturates12g
Carbohydrate238g
…which is sugars98g
Fibre51g
Protein90g
Salt4.6g
Items Consumed£1.84
Items Bought£1.53
Items Disposed£0.00

Thirteenth Day

Another bare-bones review. A day at work, so the usual barred affairs, fruit and some peanuts (instead of my normal peanut bar). Was hugely hungry by the time I’d finished; popped in to a supermarket on the way home and picked up some very cheap Polish cheese which I had with some economy pasta I’d mainly bought to see if the gripes about it being disgusting were warranted (they aren’t that bad, in conclusion). However I did end up producing a cheap, but tasteless meal. Oh, and I had way too much of it, calorie wise. Oh, I also picked up some more peanuts and milk; noticing that the latter’s price had gone up by 8.5% since last week. And that the noodles I’d had last week risen by similar. (That’s nothing; today I noted another discounter’s noodles had risen by 14%).

Anything else? Oh, kinda screwed up doing pasta in the microwave. Think it cost as much energy as if I’d done it conventionally. Later reading suggests that I should have boiled the kettle and then have let the pasta ‘stew’ in the pot for some time.

Conclusions: That cheap pasta had more protein in it than I thought; though I still think in this case was a false economy – at least my usual pasta tastes of something, meaning that slathers of sauce are unnecessary. Could a person live like this? Yes. But only if they had to. It’s pretty grim and your resolve would buckle quick. Three to four portions today; depending on your classification of the dates in one of my bars.

Energy2709 cal
Fat93g
…which is saturates22g
Carbohydrate387g
…which is sugars148g
Fibre35g
Protein90g
Salt2.9g
Items Consumed£1.82
Items Bought£2.46
Items Disposed£0.05

Fourteenth Day

Thank god this is nearly over; if nothing else, doing all this is a time-burglar extraordinaire. Today was one of those days which you seem to mainly graze; I got the calories in but don’t really remember eating that much (mainly due to the fact much of it came from date-balls, peanuts or the cheap protein shake I’d bought and has proven to be… interesting).

Went for my usual forage; discovered a couple of cheap cooked chicken pies. Said pies became my dinner – I wanted to see if nutritionally they were much better than the scotch pie I’d had before and proved to be terrible. (For the record, they were with some boiled carrots which I did semi-successfully using the ‘kettle method’ outlined the day before).

Well, my answer to this is; I do not know. All the packet had was the calorie listing, which proved to be as fucking useless as I predicted a few days before. I went online, thinking ‘well at least it will be there’ (which I have done successfully with a few other products, like the scotch pies). But nothing. Went to the supermarkets own website. Tells me ‘it is available on request’, if I email them for it.

This I refuse to do. Firstly, this was on a Saturday and I’d vowed this post would be done by Sunday, so the chances of a reply in time were slim. But more importantly; why the hell should I have to chase this up? These pies are a regular product of the supermarket’s ‘deli’. Even if the details were (for whatever reason) not listed on the packet you could have easily have put it on your website. But no. Pray tell me, why is this? Laziness? Or are you hiding just how nutritionally shit your products are? This also happened with the ‘chorizo chicken’ right at the start of this experiment.

*takes a breath*

Anything else? Oh, I picked up a half-kilo of close-dated protein powder at half my usual price, which along with the cheese I bought (for later marrying with potatoes) bumps up my daily spend, though also got some slightly cheaper apples too. On acceptance that this was the end of the experiment, did one last clear-out of the fridge (just like I did a clearout before the experiment). Only casualty was a few mushrooms.

Conclusions: The stats for this day are guestimated (well, more guestimated than usual); I’ve had to approximate the chicken pies. As you can see, I just missed the salt and saturates limit; I shall point out that my consumption that day had been unusually ‘good’ before that – hit the five-a-day today.

Energy2515 cal
Fat75g
…which is saturates21g
Carbohydrate286g
…which is sugars132g
Fibre39g
Protein95g
Salt6.2g
Items Consumed£1.83
Items Bought£6.19
Items Disposed£0.15

Final Thoughts

So, once again we have the total consumption cost of;

Condiments£2.75
Coffee / Tea£2.19
Milk£1.83
Barred Products£1.76
Meat£1.64
Fruits£1.57
Cheese£1.10
Starchy Staples£1.01
Vegetables£0.95
Peanuts£0.83
Fake Meat£0.76
Protein Powder£0.64
Baked Beans£0.60
Egg£0.60
Sugar£0.50
Premade Products£0.45
Cereals£0.47
Bread£0.35
Total:£20.00

Again, this is not strictly accurate, due to the fact that ‘condiments’ is a large grab-bag of low-consumption items but nevertheless, do need occasional replacement (I defend this spend on the basis the boring dishes would have been inedible without them and thus, their removal would be a false economy). However, I also disposed of £3 of food too – almost all being deteriorated old fruit and vegetables. I ‘spent’ in cash terms £23.47, so in total my ‘kitchen reserves’ are 47p ahead. (You may wonder why I’ve done this; it’s to ensure I am not massaging the figures by running down pre-bought reserves which are not counted in the totals).

Much of the ‘loss’ has been from the fruit department; it’s true that I’ve eaten less this week than last and thus, didn’t hit the mandated ‘5 a day’ thing (why is it that?). But not as much as you’d think; I was relatively lucky in my ‘foraging’. The result is predictable; while I’ve managed to squeeze my bill down to £2.86 a day, it’s at the cost of insufficient greenery. I’ve also managed to increase my average daily calorific intake by 90; which points to a very simple issue which I’ve started to highlight statistically – that the cheapest diet of all is generally the nutritionally shit one.

What else did I learn? Well, that meat – and meat replacements – were expensive. In fact, I only had three portions of meat in the second week if you discount what meat was within the pies. What’s more, I wouldn’t have been able to afford them at all if not ‘bargains’. That frankly throws a spanner into many traditional British meal plan; the ‘meat, starchy carb and veg’ combis. More concerning is that it slices off one of the main sources of protein.

But other sources often cost too. Cheese, milk, eggs, nuts; all come in with relatively high costs per kilo. That even with all the cost-savings my protein budget was again about 30%; and partly why I resorted to using protein powder to fortify otherwise protein-poor dishes.

This being one of the key lessons from this experiment; that nutrient density was more important than mere cheapness – which was one of the reasons I never brought anything like crisps. In fact, I lost a kilo during the experiment; now, I could stand to lose a kilo or ten but it ultimately means this diet was unsustainable long-term (even more so if I’d avoided the ‘gorge moments’).

Limitations?

With hindsight, this experiment was not designed as well as I’d intended. The most glaring issue was the simple fact that a lot of the items I bought were reduced-cost and so not representative – I am not one who shall peddle the ‘I could do it, so can you!’ line. That naturally, reduces the value of my whole experiment.

This also damages one of the key ‘food economy’ advice given; to make meal plans and stick to them when buying items. But that does not really work when much of what is for dinner is down to the lucky dip of the bargain bin. Shopping lists are similarly limited in value. My solution to this is simple; to have ‘reverse shopping lists’ i.e. listing what you already have in the kitchen rather than what you don’t. The logic here is simple; that if you know what you’ve got on-hand already, you can instantly start coming up with ways to fit in those bargain eggs, cheese or peaches in. Shopping frequently helped this; it meant that when it came to perishables, I usually didn’t have much on-hand to waste.

Another issue is the fact that despite my diligence, not all my costs have been calculated. I take both a generic multivitamin and an omega-3 supplement; the latter vital as I consume nil fish or seafood. The price; about 70p a week which shall be needed to be found.

Then there’s my water. I use a filter, due to the fact I live in one of the most limescaley parts of the land. No, it really does help me to actually drink the stuff, and to make food/drinks taste nicer – not just a bourgeois affection. But still, that’s another 75p a week.

Lastly, there’s the issue of electrical costs. I did try to keep them down, but I didn’t do it scientifically and so I’m sure I made some mistakes there. Perhaps one day I’ll work it out properly, but that’s not today.

Full Circle

But back to the original question; what is the realistically minimum level of cash a person needs to spend weekly for a nutritionally balanced diet? After my little experiment I shall say as of April 2022 that number is £25 a week. Yes, I know you did it on almost half this but you know what? Bet you couldn’t stick to it for three months. What’s more, your meals are mainly fucking laborious and at least you’re cooking for two so seems more a worth use of time. Also, that was three years ago now. Lastly, I could get it down to £20 if needs be so there’s not so much between us – I provided the extra £5 as a little bit of a margin to cater to personal preferences and the occasional substitution (I’d budget another £5 a week if packed lunches are required).

Though there are similarities between us both; near-vegetarian diets that are generally dull, limited and time-consuming. If having to draw up a shopping list, I’d select a lot of wholemeal bread, full-fat milk, peanuts, rolled oats, baked beans and eggs. Then I’d supplement with chickpeas, tomato puree, mushrooms, onions and a couple of types of fruit and veg. I generally avoided potato, pasta and rice because of their high cooking times; perhaps if I’d owned the suitable items for the microwave I’d used them more.

Which is perhaps the main point; the ownership of the kit to do this stuff. That’s more an ask than you’d think. 10% of British homes don’t have a freezer. 5% don’t have a cooker (like I didn’t for the experiment). Scarily, around 3.5% don’t have a refrigerator. The kitchen might be short of basic kit like sharp knives, ironware and heatproof receptacles. Then there’s a deficiency in ‘knowledge’; a pile of chickpeas or oats doesn’t automatically suggest meals to folks who don’t really know much scratch cookery.

I find it interesting that my £25 a week is so much more than all but one of the figures I gave from my original ‘Eating When Poor‘ post. It testifies to two things; not just the significantly higher than reported inflation in perhaps the last decade (though it’s possible my figure is more accurate than any of my examples). but also the simple fact that when you are this poor, no, the healthy option does cost more. And invariably, almost any ‘saving’ cash-wise comes at a price; either more time, more cooking and/or more fuel cost.

As everything on this blog, merely my own thoughts and opinions. Part of my Essays series.

Eating While Poor: 2022 Challenge (Part 1)

I do try to review and refresh old blog content to keep it relevant; and this week it was the turn of ‘Eating While Poor’. While expanding said content and commenting on one of the (new) examples, a mini-litany of complaints towards it built up; one of the main ones being that nobody was taking into account cooking costs – of particular interest right now with news that people are turning away free root vegetables and potatoes simply because they can’t afford the long cooking times for them.

So, I hit up Google and the like – and don’t find anything. Admittedly, I didn’t search very hard. But it’s quite possible such a thing doesn’t exist. And what does a marginally-competent blogger interested in things like fitness, diet and poverty do when encountering such a gap?

Yep. Welcome to my own, personal ‘Poverty Diet’ challenge.

Da Rules

The following have been written with the various weaknesses in the other challenges/plans in mind. While I accept I can’t do this perfectly, I can at least make a decent attempt to produce a semi-reliable result. Therefore…

#1: While I will be keeping a tally of what I spend, the headline number will be the price of what I consume. This – hopefully – shall help to give more reliable figures, allowing me to eat a more realistic diet without cheating the numbers (by say, stocking up on stuff before the challenge or anything).

#2: The price of foodstuffs disposed of shall also be calculated. I don’t think there’s much actual waste going on, but I’m curious to just how much.

#3: Various ‘low use’ items condiments, herbs, spices etc won’t be calculated on consumption, but I’ll factor in replacement spending for new items on the assumption in the long run this evens out.

#4: ‘Bargains’ are factored in at their lower price if they are available to the general public. Otherwise, they’re charged at the rate shown at the Aldi website.

#5: I shall focus on the cheapest items with acceptable quality. Sometimes, the cheapest stuff is so poor it’s actually a false economy to purchase, as well as increasing the feelings of truly ‘in the shit’. This is a ‘poverty diet’, not a ‘right on the edge’ one.

#6: As part of the challenge is whether it’s possible to eat a healthy diet when poor, I shall also be keeping a tally of the nutritionals. Yep, a food diary too.

#7: As I am ‘very poor’, this means I’m very conscious of keeping costs low. This means that I will be acutely aware of how expensive it is to cook foodstuffs and thus avoid items which require long periods of heat etc.

#8: Lastly, on the learning that quite a few folks lack kitchen appliances, I am going to limit myself even further. In this challenge, I do not have an oven. Instead, I have a two-ring hotplate which I borrowed from a bemused relative (‘but it’s kind of shit?’) for this challenge. I also have a microwave, so it’s not that bad.

So, here we go…

First Day

The first thought – while making the morning coffee – is that I don’t actually know how much loads of stuff costs. Like the price of the coffee I’m about to drink. While drinking that with a fibre bar, I do the maths; it’s 11.5p a cup. Didn’t realise that. Did a cup of tea too, for comparison; 3.6p. This is made easier by the fact I’ve already measured out the ingredients for both in the past for my food diary waay back.

Home working in the morning – another coffee and an apple happens. Realise I’ve got to go out to the Post Office; decide to pop into a discounter’s next door afterwards – see if they’ve got anything good. Realise that I don’t really know what I need to get. Shit. Being this poor seems to need more planning than my usual methods. Did spy a wholemeal loaf and some sandwich thins on ‘final markdown’ and get these, putting them in the freezer on getting home.

Afternoon I’m out at work. Normally, I’d buy something while out, but conscious of the prices of stuff, I have an early lunch at home first. Manage to find some slightly staled up pitta breads, a bit of cucumber and cream cheese. Toasted and with some herbs on it, rather nice. Though run out of onion granules, shit.

On way home from work, go via town and some shopping – now I’ve got a better idea of what I’ve already got on-hand. I need to find some barred items for ‘on site’ workdays; locate from a pound store some decent enough plain flapjacks and my beloved Mr Toms to see me through a bit. A visit to a beauty shop leads me to find a 4-pack of short-dated protein bars. Per unit will be 50p, so okay enough. Plus, shall allow a review to be done while I’m on the challenge.

I’ve already been to four shops by this point and I’m more tired than I’d normally be. The answer is simple; I’m having to look at everything; trying to find the best deal, if there’s any offers and so on. The supermarket which I got the onion granules from showed me an issue; even after the reduction for quick sale done, the items were still more expensive than the discounter from earlier.

By this point I’m hungry as hell. That early lunch was simply too long ago, I’ve come to realise too I didn’t have a proper breakfast either and remembering I have walked around 8km by this point. Have to eat a protein bar to tide me over as I set off for home.

Go via another supermarket; remembering that it was about the time for their discounting. I was right; find 100g of cooked beef for 55p. Ah, beef pittas (without cooking) it is, then. Get a lettuce and some mustard to finish it off. And a couple of bananas. And some cheap apple juice.

Have a large cup of cocoa coffee while I finish up at home, along with a banana. Like doing the food diary (showing my calorie deficit was rather serious) and the budget (ouch! This challenge isn’t going to last long if that spend is that high).

Some time after dinner, still feel hungry. Have a couple of pieces of toast to tide me over. Crap, use the last of the jam which I can’t afford to replace.

Conclusions: If I’m allowed to count the apple juice as another portion, I got my five-a-day. By my estimation, I’m about 140 calories under for my activity level. Everything else was within reasonable limits, though.

Energy2060 cal
Fat38g
…which is saturates14g
Carbohydrate315g
…which is sugars118g
Fibre45g
Protein95g
Salt5.75g
Items Consumed£3.53
Items Bought£9.03
Items Disposed£0.00

Second Day

Day off. Use this as opportunity to make a sausage sandwich for breakfast. Plus, remember yesterday. Decide to cook two lots, so I can have the other half for lunch (and save on cooking costs). Good news; I had a load of Cauldrons in the freezer, that I’d picked up cheap a couple of weeks back. With a fried onion, the other half of the lettuce from yesterday and the cheap frozen bread. Pleasant enough; though by late afternoon felt the energy shortfall, so had a peanut bar to tide until dinner.

Made the trek over to the other discounter’s; justified in this case otherwise I’d be going for a run. Plus, I’d run out of tea bags. Got a jar of peanut butter for toast in the future, as well as more bananas, fibre bars, cream cheese and a cucumber (to replicate yesterday’s lunch at some point). Then I swung past my usual supermarket on the way home.

I know I shouldn’t have. I knew the result in advance. But I needed to show you. For they’d done a mass reduction on their ‘hot food counter’, and I bought a pair of scotch pies. Two for 16p. I could see grease-stains on the damn bag. And I still got them. Even when a bloat-man had to manoeuvre his colossal gut so he could reach pie (clearly, what he needs more of right now). They also had some ‘chorizo chicken’, which I ended up consuming that night as a snack.

Well, I had said pies with a little tin of peas (pies re-heated in microwave, like the peas); it was pleasant enough, but hell, I could taste the pastry, grease and salt. Not much meat either, really. Not surprised, now I’m reading that it’s only 11% beef. That chicken… well, I’m not sure how bad that was, really because I found no nutritional listings for it. So I’ve guestimated (conclusion; okay, not not great).

Conclusions: If onion counts, I got my five-a-day. But those pies fucked everything up. They are to blame for the serious ‘bust’ on both the saturates (69% of total) and salt (38% of total). Lesson here being; basically, don’t have them. Even one by themselves is very nutritionally iffy. Got the ‘daily price’ down by 20%, though. All it cost was my arteries, apparently.

Energy2284 cal
Fat70g
…which is saturates23g
Carbohydrate291g
…which is sugars75g
Fibre35g
Protein106g
Salt11g
Items Consumed£2.70
Items Bought£5.27
Items Disposed£0.00

Third Day

Half-day; morning work from home, afternoon free. Did the now familiar fruit/coffee/fibre bar combo until lunch, which was a beef/cream cheese sandwich thins with cucumber. Pleasant enough. Afternoon of ‘pottering’; getting a few of those annoying little jobs done. That was the problem. Kept on snacking, after I’d made a peanut butter on toast around 3PM. Mainly on said peanut butter. Sign that I think my body is craving energy. Or just greed. Which is how I emotionally took it on seeing half the jar gone. Well, that was a shit idea…

As a penance (of sorts) I decided to have a light(er) dinner; did myself my own instant noodles; a ready-to-wok pack, with a little bit of protein powder, herbs/spices and a couple of salt-free stock cubes. The protein powder was a bit of a problem; in the end decided to treat it like coffee and have a ‘per use’ price using the cheapest soya brand I can stand. After consuming, learned said noodles was not as calorific than expected. But more expensive. Well, we live and learn.

Pudding was half a bottle of peaches in juice that I found at the back of my cupboard – I’d forgotten all about it, on the basis I’d not bought it. Was about six months out of date, but I reasoned that I was poor now and thus, must try them before disposing. They appeared fine, so had half of them.

Conclusions: Four fruit/veg today. That amount of peanut butter seriously screwed up things – price and calories. But problem is; without it, I’d have been in a clear calorific deficit. Also, fibre levels not that great. Plus, I am still spending too much. Plus side; salt intake pretty good.

Energy2260 cal
Fat93g
…which is saturates20g
Carbohydrate234g
…which is sugars119g
Fibre31g
Protein102g
Salt2.6g
Items Consumed£3.45
Items Bought£0.00
Items Disposed£0.00

Fourth Day

Oversleep. Not seriously, but enough that I have to hurry out the door for work. Coffee and the other half of those peaches for breakfast, chuck in a flapjack, fibre bar and a couple of bits of fruit in my bag while leaving. Have a cup of tea while there, which is at least free.

Do a bit of a detour on the way home; pop into a discounters for milk and apples. Decide to get some pears too, hoping to avoid the ‘peanut butter’ issue again. Successfully resist urge to buy biscuits. Come out three quid lighter. Tried a the cheap-type of pear I bought on way back; pleasant enough.

Remember that it was about time for my local supermarket to (hopefully) do their reduction thing, so went in there too. Not much, but did get some mushrooms cheap. Remembered to swipe a couple of paper bags on way out to store them in so they last longer.

Egg sandwich thins for an early dinner, making up for the semi-absence of breakfast; I’m kinda getting bored of variants of sandwiches as meals. Spend a couple of hours getting to know my dumbbells better, post-workout snack being a packet of curried chickpeas I’d found in the cupboard (if nothing else, I’m clearing the backlog…) which at least felt a bit substantial for once.

Conclusions: Four fruit/veg today. Sugars way up, due to pear and flapjack. But at least they’re mainly natural, spread across the day and being used. I honestly don’t see much that a nutritionist could bitch at, though protein could do with being a touch higher. But I’m seeing a trend here; even when I vary my foods, I can’t really get the total price down.

Energy1983 cal
Fat59g
…which is saturates15g
Carbohydrate301g
…which is sugars162g
Fibre47g
Protein60g
Salt3.3g
Items Consumed£2.92
Items Bought£3.45
Items Disposed£0.00

Fifth Day

Half-day again, this time in reverse. Have an All-Bran knockoff for breakfast with a spoon of sugar for a change. Vaguely surprised to realise on computation that it’s a bit cheaper per-serving than I thought. Normal round of coffee / apple / fibre bar / tea, until lunch which is a cream cheese sandwich; the repetitiveness of some of this is starting to get to me. Now time to get down to work; slogged away for a bit, another coffee and the final banana (water too, but I don’t count that) during. Then went out for a bit to finish what needed to be; came back and had a peanut butter sandwich and a chocolate coffee.

Afterwards went on what is now becoming my routine; the walk to the nearest supermarket to see what early-evening bargains they have. I’m not going to pretend everyone can do this; mine is a little less than a half-hour round trip and the weather so far has been decent. Plus, less need to do ‘artificial’ cardio, eh? I’m rewarded; find a half-kilo of baby tomatoes. Remember to swipe another paper bag for storage in the fridge.

Later that evening, decide to actually do some proper cooking. Ideally, something not a sandwich. Think this decision was decided when I suddenly got a strong hankering after chips. Decide to do the other half of those frozen Cauldron sausages with mushrooms and onion in a kind of stir-fry, so to only use one ring. Threw in a bit of tomato ketchup and some of the tomatoes bought earlier. It was quite delicious, more so because it had more than three ingredients.

But once again, the lack of starchy carbs is telling on me; end up snacking on yet another peanut bar before bed.

Conclusions: Six/seven portions today, depending whether you count tomato ketchup as a vegetable. Salt close to recommended maximum; those meat-replacement sausages took up a third by themselves. Saturates aren’t too shabby, though. Or fibre. And the ‘can’t reduce spend’ trend continues…

Energy1949 cal
Fat63g
…which is saturates14g
Carbohydrate238g
…which is sugars143g
Fibre51g
Protein90g
Salt5.7g
Items Consumed£2.98
Items Bought£0.44
Items Disposed£0.00

Sixth Day

Day off. A bit of a lie-in, then gear up with the usual routine. Get drawn into stuff enough I forget breakfast and only realise at lunch. Well, it happens. Said breakfast/lunch is some porridge, done in the microwave with a bit of spices, brown sugar and a bit of protein powder to bulk it out. While eating it, calculated it to cost 38p.

Spend half the afternoon doing a little digging online on ideas on how to try to cut cost without nutrition; come across stuff like the ‘Stigler diet‘ and a blog post trying to replicate it for the modern day. Okay, I suck at higher mathematics but I can at least do counting; let’s see if I can do this more scientifically yet come up with edible meals…

First question; what should I be consuming? As in, nutritionally? After consulting a few sources, I come up with;

Energy:2300 cal
Fat:52-90g
Saturated Fat<20g
Carbohydrate:259-374g
Proteins58-202g
Fibre:25g>
Salt<6g

Okay. So far, I’ve done fine for all of these, with the exception of the saturates and salt on Day 2. The average calorific consumption is 2107; normally this would be a concern but my calculations show that between changing my milk and cream cheese to full-fat editions, the increased calories from which should be enough.

Spend a half-hour or so mucking about items to see if I can get the price down further without screwing up the macros (while consuming an apple; a cheaper kind now as the shop had them on a special). Answer; not really, at least not without dropping the pretence of them being, well meals (one plan had me eating 8 slices of bread a day. Minus any accompaniment). Single biggest offender on this list is in fact fruit and vegetables; yes but that only works because I’m not measuring the vitamins, minerals and so on. The next suggestion is less alarming, though rather boring; eat lots more porridge.

The time for my usual foraging arrives; thank God, I found a load of cheap clementines. And some reduced cooked sausages. And a French stick. Well, despite the hope it’s sandwiches again for dinner. And judging from the size of the stick, tomorrow too.

Clearing out the fridge points out a couple of casualties; some mushrooms and a couple of lemons I’d forgotten about. And I was doing so well until now…

Conclusions: I can’t have white bread again; it’s the wholemeal stuff which is keeping the fibre rating high enough. As already worked out, porridge helped me sneak under two quid, the cheap cooked sausages doing much of the rest.

Energy2136 cal
Fat53g
…which is saturates10g
Carbohydrate297g
…which is sugars104g
Fibre19g
Protein76g
Salt5.8g
Items Consumed£1.98
Items Bought£1.16
Items Disposed£0.46

Seventh Day

Working from home day. Have some of that leftover French stick for breakfast with some cream cheese and cucumber; well, I can’t waste it and is likely to taste worse later on. At least the condiments applied made it taste of something. Had the last portion of the stick as a snack later on with a bit of margarine; nothing more than a bit of ballast to help me keep on going. The hankerings for carbohydrate and sugars is becoming more pronounced as this experiment goes on; a sign that yesterday’s calculations are correct regarding the calorific deficit.

My late lunch is another protein porridge; this time with a bit more protein and a bit of cocoa powder to bulk it up a bit. Tasty enough; and powers me though my workout session after the work of the day is done. After a snack of a pear and the last third of the apple juice, then get ready to head out for my daily ‘forage’. Discovered; a pack of cheap apples and some fake meat strips I’ve had before. Their very low cost wasn’t the only factor which swayed me; it was also the fact it could be eaten cold (and thus save cooking costs).

Dinner is another ‘proper’ cooking session; a stir-fry, with a pepper I had from a week or so ago. And other bits, obviously. And some chilli sauce I bought cheap ages ago. It was certainly nice to have an actual meal for a change, though I’m now spending half my time hungry. Pudding is one of the new-found apples, nice enough. As become a bit of a tradition now; late-night snack of a couple of spoons of peanut butter.

Conclusions: Perhaps for the first time, my macros are sufficient on all fronts; got my five-a-day, came in under the saturates and salt limit and so on. Perhaps a bit over on the calorie front; either the pre-made chilli sauce or the apple juice should have been removed (but as I was in deficit much the previous days, perhaps not so much an issue). Much of the fibre is down to the fake beef, which nicely counteracts the lack of fibre from the second half of the French stick.

Energy2491 cal
Fat52g
…which is saturates13g
Carbohydrate368g
…which is sugars174g
Fibre38g
Protein101g
Salt5.5g
Items Consumed£2.77
Items Bought£0.66
Items Disposed£0.00

Final Thoughts

So, my week’s spend, in the style of the original ‘Eating While Poor’ post, was the following;

Fruits£3.79
Condiments£1.95
Vegetables£1.91
Coffee / Tea£1.90
Milk£1.40
Barred Products£1.40
Meat£1.32
Fake Meats£1.30
Fibre Bars£0.90
Cream Cheese£0.88
Noodles£0.80
Bread£0.78
Peanut Butter£0.77
Protein Powder£0.64
Fruit Juice£0.60
Sugar£0.44
Chickpeas£0.40
Egg£0.30
Cereals£0.23
Premade Products£0.16
Total:£21.87

This is £1.54 more than my weekly ‘products consumed’ listing; part of this is down to rounding but mainly due to the non-calculation of most condiments and so on. Throw in the 44p I threw away, it would appear that my house lost £1.97 of ‘stored food’ when taking the consumption/disposal and purchase numbers together.

I can explain the relative high coffee costs; I have standards and won’t drink instant. Kerrie had her Coca-Cola, well I’ve got my nice ground arabica. The main cost; the 26% spent on fruit, veg and fungi. Forms of protein took another 30%; I think you’ll agree on the whole I’ve got a lot of bang for my buck here. What’s more, there’s precious little actual waste; either from what is eaten or what is thrown away.

Which is an important aspect for doing this challenge; normally, we’re interested in cutting calories, choosing the less fattening foodstuffs. Not here. In fact, you need to find the most nutrient-dense foods, weighing up their worth not just on price per kilo/whatever, but also how many macros they can provide. Once again, the ‘Stigler diet’ in action. Could it be that if you’re extremely poor you should have butter?

Like I was fully expecting, this diet proved to be gruelling – physical and mental. I had to go out shopping every day and what’s more, planning future meals were difficult because I was quite confined not just by my limited cooking capabilities but what was on offer. The mental stresses was more surprising; the constant trying to find the ‘best bargain’, trying to work out which item is the best value and so on was tiring. However, at very least many of my meals were somewhat tasty, due to my ‘excessive’ spend on condiments and so on. Though I’m rather tired of bread products. Yet even then, I still got quite a lot of cravings, as I’ve explained.

I’ve decided to continue this experiment for another week; to see if I’m able to squeeze any more cash out of this diet, to get my daily cost below the current level of £3.12…

As everything on this blog, merely my own thoughts and opinions. Part of my Essays series.

Death Without Grief: When Toxic Arseholes Die

This story is true – apart from the bits that aren’t. But the truthfulness of the story is increased by the editing of the tale; or more correctly, the readability of it is. The order is not strictly speaking correct, but hell, reality is unrealistic. As expected, I’ve filed off all the serial numbers to preserve identities.

* * *

When you get down to it, only two things really keep families together; genetics and shared history. Mainly the latter. And lack of contact growing up in Care had limited it between myself and my nearest sibling, and the normal glue of mutual interest didn’t exist either. As adults, we’d developed a kind or relationship ‘holding pattern’; once a month, we’d go for a coffee. Public, but not too public. Long enough to keep in contact, not long enough to piss each other off or worse, run out of things to say to each other. They had their life, I had mine and the main thing we had in common was of the genetic variety.

Which was to be the topic of discussion on that bright muggy July afternoon.

‘You see this?’ they asked, dumping a somewhat wrinkled, folded-up newspaper on the table beside my espresso once they’d sat down themselves.

‘The Courant?’ giving a little shrug on realising it was the local rag. ‘Don’t tell me something actually fucking happened worth reading about.’ ending with a little snort. But they were insistent, and I did as bidden. ‘Okay… the obituary section. Why the fuck am I…’ trailing off when I saw what they’d been driving at.

A small notice, black-bordered. Requesting that any relatives of ‘Sean O’Haire’ contact the following number immediately. As though to get their money’s worth for the ad, they repeated this message three times.

Poignant silence time. For that was the name of our father. That is, we think. In their case the paternity was rather obvious from the resemblance, but not with I. Okay, the statistical law of averages suggests that the old git was mine too, but when you’ve come from a woman who’d sleep with anyone you simply don’t know for sure.

‘Why the fuck were you reading the obituaries?’ I finally said, unconsciously taking refuge in the mundane, stalling the moment where I had to do serious thinking.

‘I like to see who’s dead.’ was the reply, face making it obvious the whole thing was puzzling to them. Looking back down at the ad, I started to understand why it was puzzling. And I don’t mean my sibling’s rather early in life penchant for reading death columns. For it wasn’t actually in the obituaries, but in the more general ‘Notices’ section which started near the end of the page and almost ran into the previous. What’s more, that the number was a local one.

‘Do you think it’s about him?’ they asked, causing me to quit staring at the ad, hoping to divine more knowledge out of it than was possible.

‘How many other O’Haires’ are in this area?’ I replied, absent-mindedly starting to roll a smoke. ‘And we both know he was still living around these parts.’ A nod to this, another silence. Then the obvious one.

‘What do you think it’s about?’ giving their cappuccino a frown as they added a sachet of sugar, while I lit my smoke and stared out at the sparse crowds in the shopping parade, not sure whether the lack of people was due to the heat or the hour.

‘I… don’t know. How old would he be, now?’ taking a sip of my espresso, looking around to make sure this discussion was private enough. Another frown in reply. Testament to the lack of relationship between us and him; his two youngest-born was not sure of their father’s age. We make a guestimate, it’s somewhere in the late sixties, seventy on the outside.

‘Old enough to be dead.’ I conclude after this trawling of memories. ‘And the guy was a fat shit who lived on beer, fags and fry-ups. In fact, thought he already was dead.’ giving a little shrug.

‘Yeah… that’s why I’ve not called it. They might want us to deal with it all.’ they answered; my turn to nod. I’d not yet at this point popped my funeral cherry and didn’t want to start with said fat shit I didn’t care one jot about. And even more importantly, have to pay for. That was the danger; both of us still lived in the area – wouldn’t hard for Them to find our locations to send menacing letters and bailiffs to once they learned of our existence. You tell a pair working minimum-wage that they might be saddled with thousands of quid of death costs.

Some desultory discussion flowed, mainly the pair of us mulling over the possible reasons behind all this – and what to do about it. Their suggestion was for us to simply ignore it. At the time this sounded to me a rather foolish idea, but with hindsight I could see the attraction – after all, the risk/benefit ratio was hugely stacked for the former. But in the end, I prevailed on them to let the third sibling from our ‘group’ know about it and that I’d go on what they decided.

The designated time up, we bade farewell and I headed off to work. On the way, I prodded the mind, trying to gauge my feelings towards the man. For I didn’t really think about him much; I’d not seen or heard from him for twenty-odd years. Like that Nirvana song, while he’d been my father, he’d never been my dad. Truth be told, I could barely remember him; how much could you recall of someone you last saw when seven? The snippets over the years assembled an image of a stereotypical ‘feckless Irishman’; drunken, violent, ignorant and lazy, sitting in squalor while hectoring the walls about how great he was and how the world had treated him so badly. Simplistic but not really stupid, a kind of base cunning mixed in a mind filled with hate for anything not him and with a penchant for petty crime.

If he was dead, I didn’t care. The older ones had more skin in the game for dancing on his grave, not me.

* * *

Back in the ‘fifties, those New Town architects had a dream; that of an elegant plaza in front of the Town Hall, ringed by green space and topped off with some shady trees and a fountain. However, generations of official wisdom had removed said trees and fountain and turned the green space into overflow parking and offices; doing well to create a concrete oven instead.

This factoid was told to me via a display board on the side of the building, as I cooked in the even-sultrier afternoon a couple days after the coffee-shop. Not by choice, mind; the three of us had an appointment with some council woman. Eldest sibling had called the number; the ‘Sean O’Haire’ had been Father, apparently. And he was dead. We needed to come in and sign the disowning papers so the council would then deal with all the death stuff on their own coin. The old git, freeloading even after death.

Yet… was it fair doing this? Surely it was our responsibility, as his kids to sort him out? Well, it was his responsibility to be a father to us, but as I’ve already said he didn’t do that either. They could have made some effort to keep in contact – social did allow the passing of letters and gifts – but he did not. He could have reached out after we left care; he did not. The man never taught me to read, to ride a bike or to shave. His labours never paid for the food that nourished me or the clothes which were on my back. I owed him fuck all. In my case, he was quite literally a stranger to me.

The council offices inside had been remodelled since I’d been in last; all glass walls and air-conditioning. The latter made the sticky heat cold and uncomfortable, the former that I was on display to the world. Our woman had actually been waiting for us at reception, a dispenser of perfectly-measured sympathy; to this date the first and last time I’ve ever been showed either of these courtesies by an a representative of the council. Leading us into a conference room which reminded me of a fishbowl due to said glass, she sat us down and so began.

First it was the proofs of relationship; all I had was my birth certificate. It was at this point where I learned that the git was only listed on mine; for the other two it was blank. I’ll admit, I was a touch disappointed that they didn’t have ‘UNKNOWN’ scrawled over it instead. And that Mother had been so stupid she’d given three different answers on the place of her birth. Not that this was a piece of groundbreaking news to us.

Even with the lack of evidence, the woman accepted it; perhaps on the basis that we had nothing to gain from impersonations. Plus the fact that two others had called in the week before asking about the man; calls from witheld numbers which had ended the moment the woman had asked if they were relatives. A reminder of the half-siblings which had never given a shit about us either.

I’ll admit; the discussion didn’t go the way I was expecting; insensitive, hasty and stilted. Shows how growing up in Care fucks you up; conditioning you to expect every interaction with officialdom to be like that. Oh, and obsessed with saving cash, to the point of on occasion openly lying to fob it off on somebody, anybody else. Later learned that Eldest had enlightened the woman about some choice bits about Father beforehand.

Turned out that Father had been living in a council flat a stone’s throw from the house we’d been removed from two decades previous. Normal ‘died alone’ jobbie; neighbours complained of the smell, policeman broke the door in and found him, about a month gone, during a heatwave. Delightful. Doctors doing the old slice-dice showed he’d had a massive coronary, though also testified another half-dozen organs were about to turn on him fatally due to decades of abuse. Eldest looked a little sad on being told it would have been instantaneous.

This experience had shaken the council woman a little, she half-admitted such; I think unclaimed nobodies and weeping estranged relatives were the norm, not relatives clearly delighted by the news of death despite the fact there was no cash incentives involved. But hey, at least it’s produced material for a professional anecdote or something. Hopefully.

The personal elements done, we then returned to the official; the disowning forms were produced, explaining that if we did disown, we’d lose all claim on his estate. Knowing said estate would mainly comprise of beer empties and debt, we did so without hesitation. It was not until later that I realised it also washed our hands to having to clear out his flat to return to the council – another arduous task I feel zero shame in shirking.

Paperwork done, the council woman wrapped it all up; gave us the details of the coming funeral, said would keep us in the loop – if any news came up – via Eldest. I remember apologising for the amount of effort the fat shit was putting her through; for amongst other things, she’d had to view the body.

Blinking in the harsh sun outside the offices and already feeling the heat pressing on me; I recall one thought; Father was getting respect that he neither deserved or had ever granted to another being, ever.

* * *

After reading all that you might wonder why the hell I actually went to the funeral. The answer to this was simple; I wanted to see who else – if anyone – would turn up to the damn thing. Council woman said she’d notify who she could and publicise it; I have no grounds to think she was lying. Plus, she’d told us about a ‘friend’ of Father’s who’d apparently been bugging her over a clock or a watch or a clock radio or whatever that Father was ‘repairing’ for them and they desired it back – wanted to see if they’d turn up.

Admittedly, I was not that interested; if Eldest wasn’t already going I wouldn’t have bothered. Middle sibling declined, citing work shift clash – a reason which I would have used myself if it had been applicable. But it would be a little tight; so the agreement was that I’d be dropped off at work straight afters.

Which was the problem. The municipal cemetery was a town away, tucked away in the back end of beyond with terrible access. I didn’t drive, Eldest’s car was then on bricks and we all both had diaries too crowded to spend oodles of time swanning about on stupidly indirect buses and/or walking for miles in this weather. This meant that Eldest had to talk around their fuck-lodger to drive us. We shall call them Leech.

Well, as Leech had no desire to do it, they left it to the very last moment to leave for the pick-up, causing them to be fifteen minutes late to start off. Once finally in the car, we then set off – very slowly, going ‘the scenic route’. No excuses; no traffic to justify the plodding 21 mph, no being unaware of the destination causing them to loop all the way around the town, like going from Watford to Heathrow via the Dartford Tunnel. After some gritted-teeth urging (carefully, as Leech had no shame and would happily simply stop the car to ‘punish us’) they entered warp speed… of 25 mph.

The net result of this was that despite the fact we’d put in decent time to spare, we were ten minutes late for the funeral. This was quite deliberate on Leech’s part, I’m sure; our punishment for getting them to do something they didn’t wish to, a lesson that to rely on them was utterly foolish and to never be done again. I told them later they were damn lucky we didn’t actually care about the funeral, or they’d be in some shit – all I got in reply was a gaslightly ‘I have no idea what you mean!’ look.

The cemetery which Father had an outing to was one of the new ones; just a big expanse of flat grass, perfectly regimented graves and with a vista of the myriad of tubes and cylinders from the nearby chemical works. Not a plant in sight, save a couple of ugly screening hedges. What’s not appreciated is that Victorian cemeteries have their charm partly because they were intended to; that it should be a public park as well as the resting-place and memorials to the deceased. This place was simply a locale to park corpses, nothing more or less.

Leaving Leech to fuss over the mythical possibility that some traffic warden would come and ticket their precious vehicle, Eldest and I hurried towards what we assumed to be the chapel; a building which obeyed the charm rating of the rest of the place – only to find it closed. That ‘we are very closed’ look you get sometimes.

A little confused – surely the service wouldn’t be over that quick – I wandered around to see if there was any hint; past a weedy hedge and spotting a mini-digger in far distance. Clearly the burial. Well, a burial. Began to trudge across the sea of straw-like grass in the midday sun on what later turned out to be the apex of the heatwave; filled with that oppressive pressure while I’m hating the fact more than ever that my workwear was mainly dark in hue.

Naturally, it was Father. I now know that pauper’s funerals don’t get ‘proper’ services; just a quick insert-name-here job over the grave by whoever the cemetery had on call – in this case, the local Anglican vicar. A little twist of the knife; the old git hated ‘Prods’. I also know that it’s pretty rare for it to be a burial, not a cremation; but this is easily explained that the council owned the cemetery.

It could be said that you can judge a person’s life on who turns up to their funeral, and what happens there. Father’s total number; six. Myself, Eldest, Vicar, Council Woman and two blokes from the funeral company (in full fig even in a damn heatwave). Of which, four were ‘on the meter’, the vicar had buggered off as soon as they’d done the reading thing and the other three had seen us approaching so held off clearing off too.

No flowers, notes or cards. Had lived in this town for at least thirty-five years and no friend had attended. None of our elusive shitbags of half-siblings had turned up (why are they shitbags? Well, that’s another story) even though they would have found out easily about the funeral. Eldest was the only one there who could genuinely say they’d known ‘Sean O’Haire’ and I’ve never heard them say anything positive about them, ever. A funeral where nobody was upset or sad for the deceased.

It was hard for me to get a decent look at the coffin. They’d put that plastic sheeting about to stop the soil-pile from fucking up the grass, but there was piles of the stuff around the edge of the grave itself, which I’d have to stand on. Even though it was all dry and I was in hiking trainers, I felt it mentally hard to do that, even though a) it was the grave of a person I despised and b) wasn’t even the grave proper. Sign of how social conditioning can rule your actions. Though to be honest one coffin looks pretty much like another; a coffin-shaped affair made of ‘wood’ of some form – though I suspect in this case, it was some cheapo composite affair or laminate than true timber. I think it had a little plaque on the top, but I can’t remember.

I stared at it for perhaps a good thirty seconds, trying to see if it generated any emotional response. No… still didn’t care. But before you say I’m a sociopath or something, I have been to funerals which I did care. I have felt grief; though not admittedly the ‘I’ve been torn in half’ level. It’s not like I was in a daze or anything. In my mind the man had been dead for years, perhaps decades; I later found out that Middle had also mentally declared our parents dead long ago too. No. I did feel something. Disgust. For him.

After rejecting putting the soil on the coffin thing (why do they do that?) I went back to Eldest – they’d not bothered to even look, instead talking with Council Woman a little way away. Confirming nobody else had turned up, that as a pauper’s funeral Father was the second inhabitant out of three for the plot. But there was nothing special about said plot; no classic mass grave, potters field thing. But there was going to be no headstone, no marker. And he only had the leasehold, not the freehold; that once the cemetery was full up he’d be top of the list to be reused. Didn’t ask what they did then; perhaps I should have.

Something to ponder, walking back to Leech’s car. That when it came to your grave; eternity didn’t last as long as it used to. Just long enough to allow those who remembered you to join the Majority too.

* * *

A week or so later the three of us were back at the offices; Council Woman wanted to see us. They’d finished clearing Father’s flat; the look on the woman’s face made it obvious she’d been disgusted by the conditions. From the gist, a combination of hoarded vaguely-useful items, old ‘projects’ and general shit à la Mr Trebus. And general filth. Lots of it. Much more than they’d thought possible for a property of it’s size. So many tins of screws, nails and clock parts, apparently. And empty bottles. Nothing had possessed any value whatsoever.

But she’d recovered what ‘personal items’ she was able to and felt it was only right that it be given to us. Which she did, discharging a largeish white ziplock which reminded me of those ones you get for bedding for long-term storage. Yet also coming with a relayed request; an aunt of ours demanded to be allowed to exhume Father so he could be re-buried in Ireland – but Council Woman had said it was up to us to agree. Surprisingly for Woman, not at all for us, aunt had zero desire to contact any of us, even though she offered to put us in touch.

Woman told us a couple of the ‘tales’ Aunt had said about Father; said in reply they were the same BS boasting lies he’d told us. And that we denied the request for exhumation. Which I shall happily report was done purely out of spite on our part. Aunt, like the rest of our ‘Irish family’ had never given a shit about us, merely wanted the body so they could do the whole big-deal whole-clan funeral thing. Minus us. Well, fuck you.

Half hour later we were back at mine; refreshing drinks in hand, ready to explore the mysterious bag. With the passage of time, I no longer remember the exact contents, but I do remember what we did not find in it, and that was perhaps more telling.

There were no photographs, for starters. This is perhaps not so shocking now with smartphones but this was a decade before and from a pensioner. Hell, even I have a few photographs. No knick-knacks or little heirlooms which might have have sentimental value. No personal letters, save one from said Aunt (which is how Council Woman found out to contact her) which said nothing rather well in eight hundred words. Nothing whatsoever which showed anything about anyone.

Then there were the things which we did have. An address book almost devoid of addresses, and seemingly none of them personal. A few Christmas cards; all from organisations, none of them with his name inside. A bus pass. Post Office card for his pension. An old mobile phone which we couldn’t turn on or find a charger for. Several leaflets, like from takeaways. A part of me, remembering an old episode of Heir Hunters parodied a funeral eulogy based on this information; Sean O’Haire, possible consumer of kebabs, rider of buses and user of a telephone. Possessor of gin blossom and a scabby bald plate.

Rather fitting, I felt; a pathetic eulogy for a pathetic man.

* * *

That was then. But what about now? Has the passing of a decade changed my view on any of this? Granted ‘perspective’? My answer is simple; not really. Helped me realise better that the above situation was truly fucked-up, but it was due to a fucked-up person which in this case, was not me.

It’s that which led me to write this story. Because I’m sick and tired of all the crap everywhere about having to ‘forgive’ estranged relatives, or being expected to conform to the bollocks about grieving. There are times where somebody – even a parent – can cross that line where forgiveness is impossible. Sometimes you are not grieving because there is nothing to grieve for. My father was the anti-Midas; anything he touched, he ruined. Sometimes – as Council Woman learned – people die alone because they were so toxic everyone sane cut them out of their lives out of a sense of self preservation. And that the world became a slightly better place with his removal from it.

On reflection, I was lucky in this. Unlike many in this kind of situation, there was no dipshits telling me that I must grieve (or worse, I was repressing grief, or even that my feelings were ‘wrong’). No liars (save that stupid Aunt) going on with Trump-level stream-of-lies about how great the coffin-inhabitant was, or pleas for me to ‘understand their predicament’, or to dismiss or minimise the crap he’d done to others over decades. And no moron to tell me ‘they loved me in their own way’ or some sanctimonious crap which not is not helpful in these situations, but makes it worse – implying that under all that layers of shit, there was a ‘decent relationship’ underneath somewhere. Or that it’s not ‘healthy’ to bear resentment towards the dead. Yeah, guilt-trip why don’t you. And tell me he’s in heaven… oh, you’d get the sharp end of my tongue.

In short – I was free, along with my siblings to speak ill of the dead as much as we wished without contradiction, disapproval or pressure to pretend otherwise. And that’s not a privilege that many get.

Okay, I didn’t get closure. But I had long realised success on that would have been close to nil in chance. Rant at him, about how a shit example of a father he was? He wouldn’t care, there was a chance he really did believe his own lies about us ‘all being out to steal his money’ (what fucking money?) and none of this was his own damn fault. A late-life ‘new leaf’? I don’t think I would have believed it, to be honest; I know the other siblings wouldn’t have. Any hope, however vague that he’d return into my/our lives as some form of functional human being possessing a soul had never flickered high, and had died in fag-end of the last century.

But I did get validation. The friendless funeral, the squalid flat, all his kids who disowned him, the self-inflicted health problems, his death alone and non-discovery… all pointed firmly that the path he’d been on twenty year previous he’d continued to the very end. We missed nothing worthwhile. That new-leaf never happened. To use more self-help terminology bollocks, I had ‘accepted’ Father for the person he was, and that was a complete scumbag. And his unpersoning had been the correct decision.

And thus, I shall continue loathing his memory in peace. On the rare occasion I think about him, that is.

As everything on this blog, merely my own thoughts and opinions. Part of my Essays series.

The Right To Offend?

I am about to do something… naughty. An action that until perhaps a week or two ago, would have led me open to getting police attention of an unfriendly nature. In fact, might still lead to it. But I’m going to go ahead and do it anyway, for it is vital to illustrate the issue.

*Clears Throat*

I disagree with the acronym ‘LGBT’ and all it’s variants. In fact, if I had my own way, it would be abolished. Forever.

(Me, right now).

*Pause*

I have just committed a ‘non-crime hate incident’, of which many English police forces – including my own – record. Now, as I am pseudo-anonymous, it is unlikely any police force would go to the lengths to try to ID me, but for all I know there may be a special list for such nasty, hurtful cowards such as I who hide behind pseudonyms.

I have grounds – quite good ones, I feel – for saying the above. Perhaps I’ll one day do a post laying out my argument. But not today. Firstly, the argument is not relevant to this post and secondly, at 119 characters my ‘offense’ is easily imaginable as a post on Twitter, Facebook or whatever. That’s important, because this post was inspired by the antics of a Mr Miller on Twitter around three years ago, and the long, drawn-out aftermath.

The Non-Crime?

The full story is here, but I’ll quickly recap now – it’s one which got lost in the combination of Christmas and Omicron, but feel it’s worth covering even this far ‘after the fact’.

In late 2018, Mr Miller was on Twitter discussing transgender issues and he did a variant of the clichéd ‘I self-identify as an attack helicopter’. Someone took offense to this, enough to the point he was reported to the police. It seems he had made several other comments which were judged to be transphobic, which led to a visit by members of Humberside’s finest. There he was interrogated, and threatened with – amongst other things – possible future difficulties with employers due to it being a stain on his DBS (‘police check’) record.

The problem was, he had not committed any offence, either criminal or civil. What’s more, the police knew this at the time. Unfortunately for the police, so did Mr Miller. For he was an ex-policeman himself. And they’d picked a fight with the wrong person, which led all the way up to the Court of Appeal, where Mr Miller finally won the right to be offensive (somewhat). Now and then the Grumpy Old Man stubbornly digging in his heels to prove a point benefits us all, and I’ll argue this is one such event.

What Issue?

Now, before anything else, I’ll make this clear – I think on the main Mr Miller was mainly wrong on the transgender issue(s) being discussed (in fact, I think we’d have a bit of a bust-up on it). Yet I won’t say for sure because I’ve not been able to read all his comments and/or had the chance to actually question him on them, so I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt there.

But my opinion on the correctness of his comments is irrelevant here. Or even the issue his comments were ‘the most part, opaque, profane or unsophisticated’ – for I do not believe being rude and/or crass are crimes in themselves. No, my beef is with the whole manner ‘non-crime hate incidents’ were handled. And we need to focus on that bit, and that bit alone. Which is why I didn’t explain why I don’t like the acronym ‘LGBT’.

The Premise

…is simple. That there’s a myriad of actions which by themselves do not constitute an actual offence, but are felt to need to be recorded. I’ll let the College of Policing explain further;

They [Non-crime hate incidents] may also be the precursor to more serious or escalating criminal offending. Non-crime hate incidents may form part of a series of incidents that, together, may constitute a crime, such as harassment. Retrospective review of crimes will often highlight earlier non-crime hate incidents that could have presented opportunities to intervene to reduce the threat.”

(Website, ‘Responding To Non-crime hate incidents’)

This, in fact makes some sense. It’s the pain of many a bullied person; when the Authority Figure is sitting there, peering at you and saying ‘well, did they actually do anything?’ the ‘do’ meaning ‘something we can actually book’. As a person who’s been bullied before, this can be really hard to actually prove. And many a bully knows exactly how to dance on this line, leaving the complainant looking petty, thin-skinned and/or nuts. Which can be almost as bad as the bullying itself.

What’s more, police record non-crime incidents all the time (not just the hate ones). It’s part of their constant intelligence-gathering systems. It helps identify problem areas, times and people; that (for example) when the Drug Squad turns up at 5AM with their door-knocker, it’s always because a case has built up to a critical point, and much of it would have been ‘non-crime’ in nature (at least at first). To deny the police their ability to record such things would be to cripple their powers of investigation, to understand patterns of behaviour and to spot warning signals.

My Twisted Knickers

So, why do I object to the ‘non-crime hate incidents’? Again, I’ll let the College tell you.

Where it is established that a criminal offence has not taken place, but the victim or any other person perceives that the incident was motivated wholly or partially by hostility, it should be recorded and flagged as a non-crime hate incident.”

(Emphasis Mine)

In this, there is no burden of proof. The complainant’s word is taken as gospel, with zero questioning. What’s more, the definition of ‘hate’ is pretty wide; ‘causing distress’, ‘dislike’ and ‘unfriendliness’ all falls under this. And some people feel ‘distress’ when they see views which clash with their own; they’re ‘distressed’ by the fact they’re not completely comfortable, despite the fact that they have no right to be as such at all times.

Which is why I am guilty of a non-crime; for there are people out there who identify so strongly with ‘LGBT’ they take any criticism as homophobic and/or transphobic. I know this because I’ve been entrapped/punished for it online and some of the crowd applauded because I had ‘started to make them uncomfortable’.

Clearly, this is wide open to abuse. The most touchy of complainants are reinforced in their belief they have a right to never be threatened by contrary views or questioned, while those wishing to wage vendettas can happily do so. Even the plain weird are pandered to; like when (as a test) a barrister said on Twitter she thought her cat was a Methodist and a colleague reported it to the police – because they implied that Methodists were ‘wandering pests that defecate in other people’s gardens’. It is now on their file, perhaps evermore.

Which is the second strand – these ‘non-crimes’ appear on DBS checks. Yes, a teacher, doctor or youth worker (and many more) may be declined for employment or even lose their current job because some crazy grassed them up because they made a comment on Facebook they didn’t like. Like for example, stating a medical fact such as ‘it is currently impossible to change your biological sex’. (Question: would you trust a medical doctor who didn’t accept such a basic fact?)

The last strand is the worst of all; there’s no easy way to discover what ‘non-crime incidents’ have been logged about you, and no way you can dispute them either. The guidance says the criminal individual is meant to be informed, but I suspect many are not – on the simple fact some 120,000 were logged in five years and I had not even heard of this until today.

We Have A File On You…

Let’s recap the situation. A person or persons unknown can make an allegation against you for making socially disliked (but legal) comments, which are not questioned, the defendant is not often aware of, is clearly unable to defend themselves on and may drastically damage their life.

Often the right-wingers are very quick to start making the usual, tired comparisons with the KGB, 1984 and so on – but in this case, I say they’ve got a point; if the above isn’t a decent description of a Chinese-style ‘social credit’ system in embryo, I don’t know what is.

For that’s how such things work. You may have committed no crime, but at some point you did something which caused the ‘bad’ stamp to be put on your file, causing doors to silently close on you and you don’t even realise it. Overlooked for promotions, forced to wait in line longer for goods, more perfunctory service from officials and so on. Or in the modern British sense, having employment issues because the police tacitly warn your probable employers you might be ‘trouble’ and they’d not want that – the enforced conformity of social media (and spying on new hires) is bad enough, but now the state is in on the game too. Or more correctly, has been for some time and we’ve only just found out, like the Snowden mass leaks a decade ago.

Enlightened Self-Interest?

Now for the secret question – why the hell you should care about this. After all, I don’t generally agree with Mr Miller. In fact, it’s in my immediate interest to have folks like him silenced. But that relies on you having a very myopic, short-term view of things. Because once such a system is constructed, it can easily be turned on you.

What’s stopping the system designed to silence Mr Miller being turned against pro-transgender commentators (for example)? It’s grown in the dark, in the dark bowels of police procedure, not actual law. How about if Ms Patel at the Home Office starts writing this definition? Or someone even worse? We’ve been here before. And when you connive at suppression of views you simply don’t like, you’re sharpening a blade which might slice your arm off later on.

Remember the definition; the offence is in the eye of the beholder and it’s not questioned. This very blog is littered with ‘non-crime hate speech’ towards Mr Johnson and other Conservative Party members, for example. Posts by Another Angry Voice detailing their aura of corruption is also ‘hate speech’. And so are articles in The Guardian criticising the Government’s actions in general. What’s stopping the police from padding their way to ‘agin the government’ critics and trying to bully them into silence over threats of it getting out to their employer’s HR people, like they did with Mr Miller? The term ‘chilling effect’ is also overused, but correct here. And couple this with the fact the government desires to remove the anonymity of online accounts…

With the final ruling partly in favour of Mr Miller, the guidance has been updated – with the apparent introduction of the old legal principle of ‘the reasonable person’; a concept which is the whole justification for trial by jury (for starters). What’s more, the police are allowed to start judging whether there is actual ‘hostility’, rather than simply taking the accuser’s word for it, however clearly demented it may be. Context is also now permissible; such as during a debate.

* * *

Yet it leads me to ask; why did it take a long, expensive legal case to for Humberside Police to quit active resistance to the idea of ‘introducing common sense’ to the guidelines? Didn’t anyone think of this in the two years of legal action? Or when the College of Policing was writing said guidelines? Did nobody think the conclusions through?

My conclusion: crappy British management strikes again; our own ‘nomenklatura’ more interested in defending their own arses and institutional reputation than doing the right thing. Believing it could bully Mr Miller into surrender, or then bankrupt him with crippling legal costs if he tried to fight his corner. It’s frankly unbelievable – no, unfortunately it is believable that they’d allow this to go on right to the bitter end. And the buck-passing non-apologies from both the Humberside Police and College of Policing show that despite this minor setback, they are utterly unrepentant.

In my book, one of the reasons this country’s going to the shit, and no, it’s not because of ‘enforced wokeness’ or some right-wing drivel.

As everything on this blog, merely my own thoughts and opinions. Part of my Essays series.

Why I Blog

Yay, three hundredth post; I’m now in the top half of all bloggers, simply from the fact I’ve stuck at it for long enough to generate three hundred posts. Or more correctly, three hundred posts which aren’t simply a photo and a couple of captions. Okay, I might have just made that up, but as it feels true, it must be!

Yet there’s an obvious question which is so rarely asked: why the hell we do it. Or if it is asked, the answer is not really that honest. Both unconscious and conscious.

After all, it’s a lot more work than most non-bloggers realise.

* * *

The first reason has to be a simple one; sheer egotism. That is; believing that I cover topics which are worth covering, and I do so in a manner which is (hopefully) both readable and vaguely authoritative and/or interesting. That I can do it better than the average person and so on.

Truth be told, I’d been producing ‘bloggable’ content for years before I finally produced my first true post. My ‘proto-posts’ had been on a few online forums, several of which I no longer frequent. I didn’t intend to do that; more that there were times in which I ended up producing said proto-posts – mainly when developing a new idea, setting out my stall and/or retorting to an alternative argument (In fact, a fair percentage of my non-review posts are forum retreads).

So, why didn’t I stick to that?

Firstly, online forums – like all social media – are ephemeral in nature. Not as pure ‘in the moment’ as say the Instragrams and FaceBooks of the world, but sometimes quite close. Depending on how well the forum is organised and indexed (both internally and externally), old ‘content’ may be effectively lost under the weight of newer stuff.

Then there’s the simple issue you have almost no control over the forum. You can be censored, banned or even nonpersoned, basically at a whim of the Admin gods – some of which can be petty arse-hats at times. Depending on how much of your output was there, this can be anywhere between ‘mildly annoying’ to ‘catastrophic’. Then there’s some deluded types who think the forum ‘owns’ all your content, simply because you put it there (and you should be ‘grateful’ for it being published there).

In fact, that’s what the ‘The Alexandrian’ and I have in common; we both are exiles from forum-land, finding in blogging a publishing medium which is less capricious and unstable.

* * *

While that was the original reason, it’s highly unlikely I’d have continued this blog for this long and sure as hell not that many posts merely on the back of my rehomed existing content. Because almost nobody cared. In fact, it was only my first product reviews which even started to get a sniff of attention, and as of last month 95% of my views are for reviews, of which make up about 60% of my whole output post-wise and perhaps 40% of the output effort-wise.

Baldly put: reviews got me views, which gave me the motivation to continue writing.

Not that this was bad. I’d already started testing out some bars and so on, so formalising and publishing my conclusions wasn’t a complete jump. I’d already done a few posts about health/fitness too, so hardly a surprise topic-wise either. And frankly, I’d gotten rather pissed off with the general absence of actual honest reviews about products, or incomplete ones, or ones hosted in locations which were awful to search.

But this raises the question; if I’m doing it for attention, why do I continue doing posts like this one – I’d be better served time/effort-wise to ditch all this ‘heavy’ stuff and stick to reviews. In fact, I may be crippling any remote chance I have for making this thing pay by doing posts like this. To which I say; so be it.

For I do this not simply to scratch the ‘creative itch’, but the belief that some of these posts deserve to be created. Sometimes, it’s a topic which has a new slant. Other times, something which I feel should be simplified and brought out of the Ivory Tower for all to see. Generally speaking, if you see a non-review post like this, it means one thing – I’ve been unable to my satisfaction to find a source online to answer my question or issue, so I’ve had to provide one myself.

* * *

This tendency is what Orwell called ‘the historical impulse’. After all, if I couldn’t easily find my answer using that big Ur-brain which is internet search engines, it suggests perhaps it’s not been done yet (or more correctly, has been done but I’m unable to find it for whatever reason).

What’s more, it combines neatly with my periodic ‘obsession questions’ – that once one has entered my brain, I won’t really rest until I get an answer. So basically, I’d have done most of that research anyway, and putting it all down in pixels and bytes helps me clear my mind and order the thoughts. I know this looks a bit narcissistic, but perhaps my musings might be of interest to others.

Yet… writers in general are narcissistic. It kinda goes with the territory. Writing (in all it’s forms) is the equivalent of you standing on a soapbox and proclaiming ‘look at me, I have something to tell you!’. Naturally, you have to believe there’s actual worth in your message, otherwise you’d not do it (whether you’re right or not is naturally a different question and to some extent subjective). Even the most humble leaver-of-comment on say, this blog generally follows this rule.

* * *

However, I’ve still not really answered the question – mainly I’ve talked about so far is the reasons why I write, not why I blog.

The other main answer to this is pretty simple; what other options do I really have? If you want to get paying gigs, you need a portfolio, and in the absence of any ‘properly published’ works, this means a blog. And if you want to ‘go it alone’… well you need the blog. What else can I do? Make some ‘zines and show a) my crap graphics skills (behold, my E in GCSE Art!) and b) the fact nobody near here gives a flying about the contents. In this case, blogging allows me to reach potential readers to a level no other medium could. Like standing outside the local McD’s handing out tracts.

Social media isn’t an option. This is clear as soon as you consider the fact I’ve just passed the 1,000 word point and have no idea what platform would even accept this offering. Social media is not about content creation, it’s about giving a soapbox to for hawkers, shills and angry randos screaming at each other, all slathered with the slick grease of money and the splatterings of turds from the trolls, bots and Russian / Chinese agents continuing in their highly successful plan to get us in the West to destroy ourselves so they don’t have to. At best – and this is a debatable ‘best’ – they can serve as a method to plug your blog and perhaps occasionally make a contact / conversation worth having.

Plus, it fails the critical point at the top; it’s a forum which you don’t control. And with all the problems associated with it.

I suppose there’s the various video hosts, but I don’t produce content (as yet) which would warrant that. Basically, you’d simply get a long video of me, reading to the camera. Honestly, I think you can live without that view (in fact, might be best you don’t see that view). And when it comes down to it, the likes of YouTube and Co can as easily kick you off their platform as any of the socials do. What’s more, I think I can embed videos to my posts if needs be…

Which is the positive thing about blogging – as publishing mediums go, it’s pretty portable. As long as you keep backup of your content (and subscribers list), you could with relative ease re-create it with little difficulty. There’s no de facto monopoly blogging site, and you can increase your level of ‘creative freedom’ by getting independent hosting which for the basics seems to be around the price of perhaps two or three takeaways a year. Lastly, the levels of censorship seems to be much lower in blogland than elsewhere – at least for now (I personally suspect ‘They’ believe them to be all-but-dead, and what better way to hide in the obscurity of a body on life support?)

* * *

Which is my ‘final thought’ of this post. That when it comes down to it, the idea of ‘free speech’ in general terms online does not exist in the ways we generally felt it did a decade ago. Perhaps it was simple naïveté; we felt that we could use tech to break the liver-spotted dead hand of the Murdochs of the world, to get away from the white-bread TV executives, cliquey print journalists and cringeworthy, out date ‘talent’. Unfortunately, we only managed to get away from Murdoch to end up being caught by Zuckerberg instead. Perhaps we should have seen that coming; after all, the ‘phases of development’ seen online follows perfectly the normal rules of capitalism. But that’s not the point I’m making today.

Anyway, the point which I am is that unless you’ve got enough outlay, the only place you really have any modicum of control/security over is in fact, a blog. Forums aren’t yours, social media clearly isn’t yours, comments on sites will only survive if allowed and content hosts like YouTube don’t really care about you unless you’re a whale of a creator. Blogs also allow you do reveal as little or as much as you desire about yourself – which is good, because I wouldn’t be so candid if had to sign my ‘real’ name. Or log in with a photo of my face.

And to be honest, I think my work would lose a bit of it’s bite if I had to.

As everything on this blog, merely my own thoughts and opinions. Part of my Essays series.

Hoarding & Poverty

This tale starts with a humble shoelace. I was making a pair of makeshift draft excluders, and required said shoelaces to tie-off the fabric. Found a couple random ones in the cupboard drawer, completed excluder #1, was happy with the result. Then a problem arose.

I had no more odd shoelaces.

Oh, I still had shoelaces. Six pairs, in fact. Issue was, all six were still usable, in lengths and styles which suit most of my current footwear. All were equally worth keeping. But once I used one for the excluder, it couldn’t be used as a shoelace again, because I had to cut it. I also only needed one more, meaning that I’d be left with an odd shoelace.

This was a serious enough dilemma which flummoxed me for around two minutes until I realised the complete stupidity of the whole affair. That I clearly had a squirrel mentality; laying up stores of items which might prove useful ‘one day’. Yet, said mentality wouldn’t let me actually use it for something out of a pathological fear of not ‘using it right’ and then needing it, but not having it for use (clearly, I was an army quartermaster in a previous life).

The ‘Poverty Mentality’

It has to be pathological, as I’m fearing an event which happened once, around a decade ago. By that reckoning, chances are the stock will outlast me. I also get through a pair of shoes about yearly, meaning I’ll be able to replenish my reserves very soon – I mean, how many shoelaces will break in a single year? And it’s not like they’re either difficult or expensive to purchase new.

Yet that’s irrelevant, for facts and logic are fighting the poverty mentality, which is ingrained within my unconscious mind, mainly due to a life of varying levels of, well poverty.

The easiest way to describe it is akin to eternally living in your personal ‘shortage economy’, like in the old East Germany or the Soviet Union. You hold onto things – like my shoelaces – in fears of not being able to get hold of them when you actually need them. I also allowed poorly-fitting clothes to accumulate in my wardrobe out of fears of being unable to afford replacements. I bought dead-cheap a load of powdered protein shake which proved rather nasty but it’s still here, just in case I go through a (cash-caused) protein famine. And non-routine cash purchases requires me to overcome my desire to simply stuff said cash under the mattress to allay my fears of future economic catastrophe.

That is the poverty mentality – when you always think tomorrow will bring a torrential downpour, so it’s best to stock up on umbrellas today. And as we go though most things in life on autopilot and it doesn’t rain half as much as we think, our squirrel-caches can grow rapidly, unawares.

…And Hoarding

While we’re loathe to admit it; the vast majority of us follow a kind of Parkinson’s Law of possessions; that it shall expand to fill all the space realistically available – that only when it gets past that point shall something be done about it. Or when we’re forced to confront the amount of crap you’ve accumulated, like on major ‘life changes’ (such as a new partner, or moving home) and you’re wondering how you ended up with such an amount.

The issue is, the majority of hoarders of this type will deny it even when the ‘accumulations’ reach critical levels; after all, they don’t (usually) possess mounds of yellowed ancient newspapers, larders filled with expired food and/or piles of rusting appliances. Basically put; they’re unable to be a subject for that freak-show which is accurately-named Hoarders; where we can gape at the clearly disturbed wade through seas of crap while explaining why a blown rusty tin of beans was still ‘perfectly fine’.

And that’s the problem.

‘Poverty hoarders’ don’t have obvious shit à la Mr Trebus (non-obvious is another matter, and generally subjective) and nor do they show the classic symptoms such as compulsive shopping, having a front room akin to a papery tomb or a kitchen home to rats and maggots. But the most important issue is that perhaps more so than any other genus of hoarder, they’re most commonly proven right.

After all, I did end up using those shoelaces, didn’t I?

Reinforcement

To continue the analogy from above, yes it does rain sometimes, and when you’re poor that seems to be more frequently. Spare parts are often artificially expensive, labour sometimes prohibitively so. Older / poorer quality items often need more frequent attention too. Often, you’ve either got to DIY it or simply put up with the issue indefinitely. Result; the accumulation of items for parts cannibalisation, random bits of wood, assortments of screws, sheets of fabric, off-cuts of lino, bags of old chargers and power packs…

Unfortunately, ‘project hoards’ (also known as ‘man-crap’) often do prove their worth… eventually. Like when I needed a sturdy cutting board and filched a piece of sturdy MDF off a relatives’ hoard for that purpose. Or my improvised workout station / storage unit from a pair of dining chairs, several bath towels and the back off an old wardrobe. Who thought that salvaged toilet handle would prove useful one day? (or last week, in my case).

The other side of this is the ‘good bargain’. Remember, the poverty mindset is always whispering ‘you won’t be able to get that tomorrow!’ which leads to snap up stuff simply because ‘it’s cheap’ and you might need it one day, or to accept usable cast-offs which are free – this can combine with hobbies/interests to create a powerful variant of ‘Gear Acquisition Syndrome‘.

But like the ‘project hoards’, this type of hoard also proves it’s worth in time. I remember, for example when I moved back out on my own a decade ago some 75% of my non-personal items were off three or four of these hoards, meaning my furnishing outlay was near nil (the other 25% I already possessed). I’ve been conditioned by experience to know that if I need a new X, it’s often worthwhile to ask around to see if anyone has a spare first…

…And Approval

Which is, unsurprisingly used as justification for their hoarding. But hell, that’s not the only encouragement going on – the last decade’s surge in ideas about ‘the circular economy’, ‘upcycling’ and all that is just more fuel for the fire. In this case, I’ll argue that the message has hit the wrong targets; the ‘make do and mend’ campaigns was aimed at folks who’d dispose of a shirt rather than replace a button, not the ones who already had old chocolate tins filled with enough buttons to fill a donation bucket and once made a pair of trousers out of two old pairs.

This has led to the rise of a new sub-species; the ‘green hoarder’. On the surface they look just like the poverty type, but their motivations are different; while the poverty one might hold on to loads of old towelling because it might come in useful, the green one does so because they feel obligated to stop things going to ‘waste’. They’re a phenomenon which I feel require their own post one day, so will leave that topic after giving one simple ‘maxim for identification’ – if your ‘subject’ will allow you to take things off their hoards to use yourself, then they’re much more a green sub-species.

Treatment?

As I’ve hopefully shown, a lot more of us have ‘hoarding instincts’ than we’d personally admit; after all, my own home isn’t packed out with crap yet I still had my ‘shoelace dilemma’. Plus, I bet I have a fair amount of stuff which I don’t think I’d really miss. But like say, alcoholism, we only feel ‘there’s a problem’ when it actually starts to impinge on our lives or more commonly the lives of others.

Problem is, the ‘normal’ hoarding treatments will be not that effective on us. Our hoards are generally not obvious shit, which precludes a ‘skip solution’. They’re also relatively logical; my dilemma was driven by a desire to not waste it, not any warped emotional attachment to it due to not getting any love as a kid or something.

This is why the best self-help I’ve done is to accept I have the poverty mentality. Like some old folks who lived through the era of rationing, I unconsciously feel the need to be ‘thrifty’. A usable, decent item with the line ‘it’s free!’ is difficult to resist (and I normally only managed it in the past because my flat is so small), and my eye is seemingly always on the prowl for ‘bargains’. Being mindful of my own problem means I should be better-able to consciously overrule it. Hopefully.

The other possible solution is to volunteer in the rear of a charity shop for a while. I found doing that to be quite a decent antidote to the mentality; mainly due to the fact some 80% of the items they have are basically, shit, crap and tat and spending long hours in a hugely cluttered, dusty room with poor ventilation can make you hate ‘stuff’ quite quickly.

As everything on this blog, merely my own thoughts and opinions. Part of my Essays series.

Blogging: Lessons From The Second Year

It’s now been two years (ish) since I launched ‘Minority Of One’, and while updates have rather slacked off in the last few month (more on that in a bit), it’s a project I have no intention to give up any time soon. Anyway, in the vague hopes that my experiences might be a help for other bloggers who aren’t merely in it for the money, here’s my semi-structured thoughts on the topic…

Reflections…

Firstly, the stats. In the 365 days since my first year checkpoint, I’ve had 2,254 visitors, 2,766 views, 470 ‘likes’ and added 34 more followers (more on that later too). In return I’ve written around 82 thousand words (a little shorter than Rowling’s Chamber Of Secrets) in 96 posts, which I guestimate has taken perhaps ~250 hours to write. My remuneration remains on zero.

This result frankly surprised me a little; visitors up five-fold, views up four-fold. But is it as good as it first appears?

Digging Deeper

The answer – on closer look – is a negative (it usually isn’t). Of the 2,766 views, 1,933 was of posts from the first year and 208 are of category index pages which thus, don’t count. Result; the true views of new content in the last year was… 625. Which is still a 46% increase of views over Year #1, but hardly amazing. But it also means that some 75% of my views are for ‘old’ content.

However, statistics can always be turned around a few times. One differing view is that while last year’s posts had a had a mean view rate of 2.22, this year’s posts now score 6.5 views; a just under three-fold increase. Or the fact the old posts have managed to increase their viewer rate to a mean of 10.17, a near five-fold increase. Which shows while it’s not as instantly impressive as the headline, it’s still a good showing.

The next question is; what did my viewers look at? That answer is simple – product reviews. In fact, only 5% of my post views this year were for non-reviews. It gets ‘worse’ from there; the top five posts generated 46% of my views, while the top ten produced 64%. Don’t get me wrong, it’s nice to have vaguely-popular posts. But it does mean my other posts were a waste of time? Not completely; 187 posts (63% of total) generated at least one view in the last year.

Yet… is it possible to look at these stats and work out why my ‘top ten’ became so? Yes. Seven, perhaps eight of them are for reviews of products I remember didn’t have other online reviews at the time of writing. Theory; search engines are directing folks to look at the ‘only review in town’. The fact that 76% of my referrals came from search engines (90% Google) suggests this. Only around 1.5% of my visitors have no obvious ‘point of origin’, which suggests perhaps a couple of dozen have bookmarked me or dug me out of their browsing histories. Lastly, some 3.5% are coming from my own plugging efforts; though it needs to be said I don’t go out of my way to spam plugs.

This is backed up with the geographic location of my readers; 70% are within the UK, with another 6% from Ireland (who generally speaking get the same product ranges as we do). Language also explains things; 12% comes from the rest of the Anglosphere, primarily the USA, Canada and Australia. Not surprising one bit, as I only write in English. The majority of the rest hails from Europe, mainly Germany and Italy.

Conclusions

Well, the first one is pretty obvious; that if views are all that I crave, I should ditch anything save the product reviews. But as I’m not simply in it for the possibility to make a living off this, I won’t. Though I will up my allowed ‘runs’ of reviews (as in how many I can do before doing a non-review post) from four to five.

This isn’t a mere accommodation towards ‘what’s popular’, but also the fact that my blog cross-linking is also a factor. After all, some 7% of my views are for the category index pages, and there’s an obvious (though stat free) level of a few viewers following a second review link from the original review (normally, when I’ve done a direct comparison). Ergo, more reviews equals more links to other pages (not all reviews) and thus, a better use of my ‘back catalogue’.

Polishing & Sorting

Speaking of back catalogue, this blog only really took off this January. The last half of 2020 I was getting around 100-130 views a month, but for the first six of 2021 it was 240-340. Now, this is only a theory, but one important thing happened in early January – I did a full ‘review and refresh’ of all existing content. I added more links, corrected typos, improved the use of categories and in a few cases did a fair bit of rewriting. I’ve looked at quite a few blogs now, and while mine may not look that snazzy, it is at least (I feel) quite easy to navigate – with decent tagging, category indexes, cross-linking and so on.

Now, correlation does not mean causation, but when all else remains constant (as in, I didn’t change my normal blog habits etc) it is semi-safe to suspect that my ‘refresh’ and the improved organisation had a positive effect on my view ratings.

Likes & Followers?

A smart eye will notice I’ve not really talked about these yet. The reason is simple; I don’t think much of either. Now, disclaimer; if you’re one of my followers reading this, this section doesn’t apply to you. Nor does it if you’re one who likes the post after reading it.

However, I am sure you’re in the minority for both. I have seen followers who like posts that they’ve not read. I know this, because these are in some cases posts nobody has read, or at very least didn’t read on the day of the like (if there is a way to read an blog post without showing up on the counter, please tell me how).

Yet, the ‘like’ system does not appear to be completely rotten. A couple of months ago, I produced a ‘trap post’; a review which was literally, just a title and tags. Just to see if anyone liked literally, just a title. And nobody did. (I added the actual content at this point).. So at very least, it’s not a bot doing it. Or more correctly, not a stupid bot.

It’s harder to notice ‘oddities’ within your followers, but I’ve spotted a bit; there’s a few marketeers there and more importantly, I’ve started to keep an offline tally of all my followers – which allows me to keep a check of the ones I’ve lost (a facility not offered by my blogging software). And generally, they fall into two categories; blog accounts which have been destroyed and a few existing bloggers who quit following me after I didn’t reciprocate (for the record, I do follow blogs, merely don’t follow them like that).

Declining Output?

Stats don’t lie. In short, this blog continued to grow as long as I kept a semi-steady stream of new content. The last four months has generally not seen this and my viewer stats have stagnated, even shrunk a little bit.

In some respects, this was inevitable. There’s the ‘low hanging fruit’ issue; many of the topics I already had rattling around my head semi-prepared have now been written, requiring more effort to come up with new topics. The various pandemic-related restrictions have meant more time at home, and thus more opportunity to produce content – there’s been a few times where I had a good idea for a post, but I lacked the time to produce it. And as they were ‘current event’ posts, I could hardly produce it a week or two after the event, could I?

What’s more, the length of posts have increased; my stats show that the average length has gone up from 721 to 854 words. But the main reason has to be a combination of procrastination and impostor syndrome; I only feel remotely qualified to comment on any subject unless I’ve done a load of research into it, and half the time I cannot be arsed to do that. Or lack the time to do it. Which suggests that I need to be stricter with myself with things such as distractions and so on.

Final Thoughts

Re-reading my first year review and then this one shows a marked shift in focus; the first one was about the creativity side of things (writing and so on), while this one mainly had me fussing over the various stats I got from my WordPress Dashboard.

But even so, I feel that this post does have some utility; for this is an ‘annual performance review’ for a personal, genuine blog – not some overly slick-shined professional product-pushing, topic-focused, social media integrated ‘influencer’ account with 50k hits a month or something. Which unfortunately, are the top results when I asked a search engine the phrase ‘2 years of blogging’.

I suspect the majority of blogs in the world are more akin to mine than theirs, thanks very much. And so in this respect, my thoughts and experiences are more valid than theirs – at least on this topic.

Plus, I ain’t getting paid to shill for any company, which means I have no financial incentive to lie about stuff…

As everything on this blog, merely my own thoughts and opinions. Part of my ‘Essays‘ series.

Coronavirus: In Retrospect

So, a committee of MPs has spoken; that there was much left to be desired regarding the UK Government’s response to the pandemic. In fact, the levels of non-desired outcomes were so high they called the pandemic ‘one of the country’s worst public health failures’. That’s quite strong words, particularly when you remember that this committee was not even a full enquiry with powers to summon witnesses to provide evidence under oath.

But on the plus side; we now know why Johnson went on holiday a few days before, don’t we?

The Government’s partisans and rent-a-hacks instantly rushed to defend this, trying to explain away the bad news by saying they’d acted the best they could at the time, it was the advice they were getting and nobody could have improved the results. Hmm… really?

Let’s put that to the test. By doing a quick review of some of my old blog posts and seeing how they held up with the lens of hindsight. And what the Government actually did.

Risk, Statistics and You

15th February ’20

I’m way off the mark here. I completely fail to appreciate the coming storm; if I remember right I didn’t even consider the possibility it would become an pandemic. I think I felt that we were going to see a repeat of SARS some twenty years back; a epidemic which was contained before it was lapping on British shores.

The only bit I was sort of right about was my fagpacket fatality rates, which at 2% was rather close to the ~1.5% we eventually saw in the UK in 2020. But because I never even considered the possibility that we’d end up seeing 50,000+ plus cases weekly for several months, I never considered the cumulative effect on our heath services. Or what it would do if it ripped into the UK’s rather vulnerable-heavy demographics (such as obesity and age). But in my defence, that post was not a real focus on Coronavirus, more a talk about risk and statistics. Though at this point the whole UK known case-load was nine.

(That bit is important, but that’s a topic for another day).

How Presenteeism Will Cause the Pandemic

2nd March ’20

My first proper focus is much more on the ball. I still don’t appreciate just how contagious the virus is (measuring in months, not weeks), no – but I do realise that we were cruising fast towards a full-blown pandemic which would require ‘China-level controls’ (aka lockdowns) to break the transmission rates. I got the issue that the current system of sick pay etc was simply inadequate to the task, that many employers could not be trusted to allow their workers to take the time off to isolate unless forced to.

At this point, the Government was steadfastly denying there was any real problem. It was still recommending (not ordering) self-isolation for suspected cases (which prompted the above post), while saying that any restrictions would damage the economy. On that very day the number of known UK cases was 36, and the first COBRA meeting was held on the topic. Johnson’s appearance was a negatory. So, round one to me.

The Coronavirus Economic Crisis

17th March ’20

Most of this post is a quick outline of how consumer economics work, so readers could understand the seriousness of the coronavirus-related implosion – pointing out that the death-spiral was one never seen before economically and thus, needed direct stimulus to the population to stop everything falling apart.

Three days later the first Lockdown was announced, along with the furlough / self-employment schemes – systems which were both more generous but less universal than my suggestion, which was more akin to what they did in the USA. Clearly, at the time I was writing the Government was working hard to assemble the systems to run all this – but I recall the lack of information out of them was so large that the announcement of said Lockdown was a complete shock.

I’ll call that another draw.

The Coronavirus Endgame?

25th April ’20

The next few Coronavirus posts are better snapshot pieces, so we move forward a month where I tried to apply my mediocre knowledge to make a guestimate on how and when the pandemic may end. Re-reading it with the glories of hindsight, I cannot fault my logic, with one exception.

I did not consider the possibility of vaccinations conferring immunity (or something close to it for most) but not stopping contraction and/or transmission.

At that point, the Government was throwing cash at clinical trials for what will eventually become the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine while the death-toll clears 20,000 and the recovering Bozo announces we have ‘turned the tide (a comment which might have been the catalyst for the very post). Another draw, yes?

Johnson’s Dead Cat

29th May ’20

The next prediction is once again on the money. Mainly spurred by my ‘reality based analysis’ using the points from above, I make it clear I don’t think it’s over at all, and we were courting disaster by being so blithe in regards to ‘reopening’ – that at best, it was a summer respite, a time to ‘come up for air’ before another Lockdown happened in the Autumn. Which everyone knows should have happened in October, and really happened in November.

Weird, that I win this round despite the fact we drew the previous one. Tentative conclusion; the Government was not listening to the advice. Which has since been proven – that Johnson is an eternal Micawber, ignoring anything that ‘is gloomy’, even if it’s truth.

Could Vaccines Make The Pandemic Worse?

2nd February ’21

The next predictive post is not until we see the first fruits of the vaccine rollout, and it’s a rather decent one. I finally realise my mistake from April: immunity didn’t automatically mean zero transmission. I fret about how mass vaccinations might cause overconfidence and lead to the disease becoming endemic within our society. I wonder about a vaccine booster campaign will be needed later on. I also complain that the Government was not explaining this to the public. Well, they wouldn’t, because with the vaccine rollout was actually going well, mainly due to the fact they – or their dodgy mates – didn’t have anything to do with it save signing the cheques.

I grant another point for me, the clincher being that Johnson had said the very day before he was optimistic about overseas holidays that summer. Micawber just don’t learn, does he?

Riding The Third Wave!

4th July ’21

With hindsight, I’m inclined to give myself a half-mark on this. I clearly identify the date where the Government had decided to declare Coronavirus ‘over’ (for political reasons) and try to force a sense of normality on the country. That it was now back to Plan A; to ride the wave of infections out and hope it burns out or something. I also make a as-yet unfulfilled prediction; that another ‘Lockdown’ (of some form) will only happen if the NHS teeters close to collapse under the strain and/or we get a new mutant variant.

Time will only tell on that one.

Results

Well, I found three times where my predictions were clearly better than the Johnson Government’s – the best one being when I called a UK pandemic three weeks before the first Lockdown. And none of my predictions have been any more wrong than the Government’s either.

In short: if the Government’s actions through the pandemic was ‘the best they could do’, then they were too stupid to be the Government. Similar conclusions can be had when comparing the UK to other nations of our size and level of development; I think the only other which has been worse than the British response is the American, and that’s improved markedly after Trump’s end.

Nor do I think they’ve really learned from their mistakes either.

Let’s try to remember that, even when all the Tory hacks try to practice gaslighting, revisionism and outright lying about the past.

As everything on this blog, merely my own thoughts and opinions. Part of my Covid Pandemic and Essays series.

Riding The Third Wave!

So, apparently it’s full speed ahead for a complete ending of coronavirus restrictions on the 19th of July; at this point two weeks and one day hence. The signs are obvious; it’s been leaked, Government Ministers have been talking about shit like ‘personal responsibility’ about masks and Johnson has a big announcement lined up for tomorrow. Yay! It’s all ended, didn’t we do so well? Don’t look at the massive deathtoll, or the fact we seem to have scored worst in the general response in the whole of Europe save perhaps Belarus. But…we’re doing well in the footie! Nice weather is here! Horray for us! Boris, our mate doing a moronic thumbs up at us on a big stonking flag, to ‘connect’ with us plebs! Quite coincidently, I wrote about how this government likes to create false, lying narratives literally a year ago to the day. Which slightly worryingly, was the last time they tried to pull this stunt and well… we know how it turned out last time.

Now, a lot from last year’s post applies again here, so I won’t do you a disservice by recycling content (simply giving you another link to read it yourself instead) so I will merely mention new stuff.

It’s quite clear; we’re in the ‘Third Wave’, but it is a rather strange wave. Deaths are still very low, and hospitalisations are thankfully still low when compared to the level of known infection out there. And the majority of this is down to the vaccine rollout; it’s stopping deaths and hospitalisations and blunting transmission and infection (for vaccines don’t make you immune). Most of the folks being infected now appear to be the young (under 30s and teenagers). Luckily, they’re the ones also less likely to die from the infection.

Plan A, Redux.

This means the emergency is over, in the government’s mind – this much I’m sure of. ‘An emergency’ in this case being ‘something which could cost us the next election’. ‘NHS obviously collapsing’ is clearly one of these, along with ‘the nations care homes turned into mortuaries’. Now these two scenarios have been removed, this means it’s ‘time to live with the virus’.

What’s more, the key Tory demographics – the old, the rich and the suburban – are not only the ones highest vaccinated, but also the ones most likely to be able to continue doing virus-limitation strategies, like homeworking if they so desire. This means that now coronavirus is merely a massive nuisance to them; they want to go on holidays, theatres and suchlike.

The groups poised to ‘take it on the chin’ are the ones who don’t vote Tory anyway, so their opinions are worthless. Let the nations twenty-somethings wheeze and stagger with ‘Long Covid’; I’m sure most are just faking it. Need to keep those kids in classes, ‘cos otherwise their parents might have to miss work to look after them. Speaking of which, our landlord mates are sad, so back to the office for you all cubicle-drones! All the previous support was so massively expensive, and now ‘there’s no money left’ when we all trudge back to the coal-face.

The Tories are back, in all their disgusting glory. Time to ride that wave, back to ‘normality’ where everything is exactly like it was in 2019 and we oiks forget any ‘silly ideas’ the pandemic gave us, like flexible work conditions, not being plagued with presenteeism and public services actually getting decent funding and respect.

Instead, we’ll get more lies, more Austerity, more flags and more culture war. And hoping the Tory voters are either too stupid, too blind or too selfish to notice/care for the damage being inflicted on those ‘other people’.

Yet… I’m not so sure that’s going to work.

As everything on this blog, merely my own thoughts and opinions. Part of my Covid Pandemic series.